Intellectual Property

  • July 27, 2026

    AbbVie Seeks Block On Alkem Generic Constipation Drug

    AbbVie Inc. and collaborator Ironwood Pharmaceuticals urged a New Jersey federal court to bar India-based generic-drug maker Alkem Laboratories from selling generic versions of their branded constipation drug while associated patents are active, arguing Alkem would violate patent law by doing so.

  • July 27, 2026

    Ad Patent Claims Against Hulu Are Invalid, Judge Says

    A California federal judge has cleared Hulu from a lawsuit accusing it of infringing patents covering ways to deliver content and advertising through streaming, after finding the patents themselves were invalid to begin with.

  • July 27, 2026

    Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court

    The Delaware Chancery Court last week tackled disputes involving restrictive covenants, corporate governance, trade secrets, real estate investments, receiverships, and books and records demands.

  • July 27, 2026

    NASCAR Says It's 'Overwhelmed' By 'Mass Counterfeiting'

    NASCAR is cracking down on counterfeit merchandise in a federal lawsuit filed Monday in North Carolina that seeks to block an alleged network of foreign retailers from selling knockoff clothing and collectibles through online marketplaces, social media platforms and search engines like Google.

  • July 27, 2026

    Stewart Leaving USPTO This Week For Private Sector Job

    Deputy U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director Coke Morgan Stewart will leave the office this week to return to the private sector, she told the USPTO executive staff Monday in a message obtained by Law360.

  • July 27, 2026

    End Defamation Claim Against Baker Botts Atty, Court Advised

    A Florida federal magistrate judge has recommended that a defamation claim against a Baker Botts LLP patent attorney be tossed, saying an inventor hasn't shown that the lawyer's comments to a reporter at issue in the case were defamatory.

  • July 27, 2026

    Arnold & Porter Hires King & Spalding ITC-Focused Atty

    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP has hired a King & Spalding LLP partner in Washington, D.C., who will continue his intellectual property work focused on the cross-border aspects of technology and life sciences disputes, the firm announced Monday.

  • July 24, 2026

    Phillips 66 Inks Deal To End Patent Case Revived By Fed. Circ.

    Phillips 66 has settled allegations it infringed Magema Technology's oil refinery patents, reaching a deal nearly a year after the Federal Circuit held that ordered a new trial in the yearslong battle.

  • July 24, 2026

    IP Cases In The Spotlight As ITC Adds 5 New Commissioners

    The Senate's confirmation of five new commissioners at the International Trade Commission, including two who were staffers on the intellectual property committees in Congress, could lead to a greater focus on IP cases at the commission and efforts to speed them up, attorneys say.

  • July 24, 2026

    Big Fish Can't Pursue Apple Store Takedown, Dev Says

    An Armenian game developer accused of withholding source code belonging to Big Fish Games urged a Washington federal judge Friday to block the company's attempt to have games removed from the Apple Store.

  • July 24, 2026

    Full Fed. Circ. Urged To Reconsider Pfizer's Paxlovid IP Win

    Enanta Pharmaceuticals is asking the Federal Circuit to rethink its June refusal to revive a patent it had asserted against Pfizer over its COVID-19 treatment Paxlovid, saying the court acted beyond its authority.

  • July 24, 2026

    Daily Beast Sued Over Image Of CEO In Viral Coldplay Incident

    A photographer sued the Daily Beast in New York federal court on Friday for using his image of Andy Byron, the former CEO of software company Astronomer who was caught in a viral "kiss cam" incident at a Coldplay concert.

  • July 24, 2026

    Finch Therapeutics Can Seek Ch. 11 Plan Votes

    A Delaware bankruptcy judge on Friday conditionally approved the disclosure statement for microbiome treatment developer Finch Therapeutics' Chapter 11 plan, allowing it to solicit creditor votes.

  • July 24, 2026

    Yale Age Test, Allergy Death, Wine Royalties: A Midyear Report

    In the second half of 2026, Connecticut courts are being called upon to decide closely watched issues such as whether the state's largest hospital group violated federal disability and age discrimination laws when requiring providers over age 70 to undergo mandatory cognitive tests.

  • July 24, 2026

    NCAA Urges Judge To Not Let Athletes 'Rewrite' NIL Deal

    The NCAA has opposed an effort to relax the oversight of college athletes' third-party branding deals, telling a California federal judge that the players are looking to "rewrite" a historic antitrust settlement. 

  • July 24, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Backs Invalidating More PTAB Railcar Patent Claims

    The Federal Circuit on Friday backed another Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision that claims in an Amsted Rail Co. Inc. patent on monitoring trains were invalid, less than two months after affirming similar board decisions on two other patents.

  • July 24, 2026

    Novo Asks NJ Judge To Stop Lilly's 'Deceptive' GLP-1 Ads

    Novo Nordisk Inc. asked a New Jersey federal court Friday to block rival Eli Lilly & Co. from running ads allegedly comparing their respective GLP-1 drugs using "outdated" clinical trials and "false superiority messages," arguing the ads are damaging its reputation and misleading consumers.

  • July 24, 2026

    Spotify 'Slow-Rolled' Discovery In Audiobook Case, Court Told

    A nonprofit royalties distribution group said Spotify has "slow-rolled" discovery in a case challenging its new method for calculating artist royalties and asked a Manhattan federal judge to order the streaming giant to produce key documents.

  • July 24, 2026

    Vicor Rival Alleges Trade Secret Misuse In WDTX Suit

    Semiconductor company Delta Electronics accused competitor Vicor Corp. of disclosing its confidential trade secrets as part of a campaign of aggressively pursuing patent allegations against rivals in order to get licensing revenue.

  • July 24, 2026

    5 TM Cases & 1 Strategy To Watch In 2026's Second Half

    The U.S. Supreme Court will weigh a trademark dispute that asks whether juries or judges should decide if a mark is inherently strong, while courts will continue testing the impact of the justices' Jack Daniel's decision over a key test in trademark infringement cases. Here are Law360's picks for trademark cases to watch for the rest of the year.

  • July 24, 2026

    UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London

    The past week in London has seen financial advice firm Smith Square Partners sue ailing social housing company Home REIT, Pogust Goodhead hit with a contract claim by one of its investors, and Entain faced with its latest claim in expanding litigation linked to alleged bribery at its former Turkish business. Here, Law360 looks at these and other new claims in the U.K.

  • July 24, 2026

    Sensodyne, Aquafresh Makers Sue Over Rival's 'Sensio' TMs

    The companies behind Sensodyne and Aquafresh have sued a beauty and personal care retailer, alleging its "Sensio" toothpaste range and "Triple Protect" oral care products could cause consumers to confuse them with their best-selling brands.

  • July 23, 2026

    Patent Atty Sues USPTO Over 'Flawed' Disciplinary Procedure

    An Ohio patent lawyer Thursday accused the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office of using an unlawful "pay for play" system for its disciplinary proceedings against attorneys, claiming the disciplinary proceedings are "inherently biased" and rigged against him and others facing discipline.

  • July 23, 2026

    Samsung Seeks $1B Bond If Pictiva's Injunction Bid Granted

    Three Samsung entities urged a Texas federal judge on Wednesday to reject Pictiva's motion for a preliminary injunction to ban them from selling high-end QD-OLED TVs while a suit over Pictiva's patents plays out, but said if such extraordinary relief is granted, it should come with a $1 billion bond.

  • July 23, 2026

    Google Must Face Ex-NPR Host's AI Voice Suit In State Court

    A California federal judge ruled Thursday that former NPR "Morning Edition" co-host David Greene's claims that Google misappropriated his voice in an artificial intelligence podcasting product could proceed in state court, rejecting Google's contention that his claims arose under the Copyright Act and thus belong in federal court.

Expert Analysis

  • What Recent Dataset Suits Signal For AI Training Litigation

    Author Photo

    Plaintiffs are moving away from abstract debates about artificial intelligence at large and toward dataset provenance, and three filings illustrate how provenance is pled using public dataset documentation, archives and discovery‑ready allegations about copying, retention and downstream handling, says Yulia Leshchenko at Name & Fame.

  • Series

    Playing Piano Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Playing piano and practicing law share many parallels relating to managing complexity: Just as hearing an entire musical passage in my head allows me to reliably deliver the message, thinking about the audience's impression helps me create a legal narrative that keeps the reader engaged, says Michael Shepherd at Fish & Richardson.

  • AI Trade Secret Conviction Highlights Espionage Risks

    Author Photo

    A California federal court's conviction last month of an ex-Google engineer who stole artificial intelligence trade secrets for the benefit of China is the latest in a series of foreign economic espionage cases and illustrates the urgent need for U.S. companies to implement robust security measures, says attorney Peter Toren.

  • How To Counter 7 Logical Fallacies In Legal Arguments

    Author Photo

    Many legal arguments are riddled with reasoning flaws that can effectively distract or persuade the fact-finder, but these tactics lose much of their power when attorneys recognize and strategically shine a light on them, says Allison Rocker at Baker McKenzie.

  • AI-Generated Doc Ruling Guides Attys On Privilege Risks

    Author Photo

    A New York federal court's ruling, in U.S. v. Heppner, that documents created by a defendant using an artificial intelligence tool were not privileged, can serve as a guide to attorneys for retaining attorney-client or work-product privilege over client documents created with AI, say attorneys at Sher Tremonte.

  • How To Turn EU AI Act Disclosures Into Patent Assets

    Author Photo

    As the Aug. 2 deadline approaches to comply with provisions of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act governing high-risk AI systems, intellectual property and AI leaders should consider steps to leverage documentation requirements to surface patentable subject matter, reinforce inventive-step narratives and align regulatory timelines with patent filing strategy, say Lestin Kenton, Roozbeh Gorgin and Ananth Josyula at Sterne Kessler.

  • The Law Firm Merger Diaries: Leadership Strategy After Day 1

    Author Photo

    For law firm leaders, ensuring a newly combined law firm lives up to its promise, both in its first days of operation and well after, includes tough decisions, clear and specific communication, and cheerleading, says Peter Michaud at Ballard Spahr.

  • Fed. Circ. In Jan.: On The Validity Of Expert Testimony

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Barry v. DePuy, addressing whether expert testimony is admissible even if it does not strictly adhere to the court's claim construction, suggests that exclusion via a Daubert motion is appropriate only when the line to improper testimony is clearly crossed, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.

  • Reel Justice: 'Sentimental Value' And Witness Anxiety

    Author Photo

    "Sentimental Value" reminds us that anxiety can interfere with performance, but unlike actors, witnesses cannot rehearse their lines or control the script, so a lawyer's role is not to eliminate stress, but to create conditions where the accuracy of a witness's testimony survives under pressure, says Veronica Finkelstein at Wilmington University.

  • Calif.'s Civility Push Shows Why Professionalism Is Vital

    Author Photo

    The California Bar’s campaign against discourteous behavior by attorneys, including a newly required annual civility oath, reflects a growing concern among states that professionalism in law needs shoring up — and recognizes that maintaining composure even when stressed is key to both succeeding professionally and maintaining faith in the legal system, says Lucy Wang at Hinshaw.

  • How The Fashion 'Dupe' Economy Is Redefining IP Strategies

    Author Photo

    Fashion brands' recent experiments with unconventional trademark strategies highlight the growing impact that "dupe" versions of luxury items are having on the fashion market, as well as growing pressure points in trademark and trade dress law, say attorneys at Marshall Gerstein.

  • Series

    Trivia Competition Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Playing trivia taught me to quickly absorb information and recognize when I've learned what I'm expected to know, training me in the crucial skills needed to be a good attorney, and reminding me to be gracious in defeat, says Jonah Knobler at Patterson Belknap.

  • An Instructive Reminder On Appealing ITC Determinations

    Author Photo

    A recent Federal Circuit decision, partially dismissing Crocs' appeal of a U.S. International Trade Commission verdict as untimely, offers a powerful reminder that the ITC is a creature of statute and that practitioners would do well to interpret those statutes conservatively, says Derrick Carman at Robins Kaplan.

  • Clarifying A Persistent Misconception About Settlement Talks

    Author Photo

    An Indiana federal court’s recent Cloudbusters v. Tinsley ruling underscores the often-misunderstood principle that Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence does not bar parties from referencing prior settlement communications in their pleadings — a critical distinction when such demands further a fraudulent or bad faith scheme, say attorneys at Hanson Bridgett.

  • Opinion

    Federal Preemption In AI And Robotics Is Essential

    Author Photo

    Federal preemption offers a unified front at a decisive moment that is essential for safeguarding America's economic edge in artificial intelligence and robotics against global rivals, harnessing trillions of dollars in potential, securing high-skilled jobs through human augmentation, and defending technological sovereignty, says Steven Weisburd at Shook Hardy.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.