Intellectual Property

  • June 12, 2026

    Women's Clothing Co. Wins Part Of Textile Patterns Suit

    Women's clothing brand Jude Connally was granted a win on some of the issues in a copyright infringement case brought by a textile company that alleged its protected patterns were being copied.

  • June 12, 2026

    Atty Faces Sanctions Over Fake Quotes In Taco TM Fight

    A Connecticut attorney could be sanctioned for including fake case quotes and misrepresentations of the law in court filings that seek dismissal of a trademark case against a taco restaurant, a federal judge said Friday in questioning whether the documents were sullied by artificial intelligence.

  • June 12, 2026

    Salesforce Dodges Full Fed. Circ. Review Of IP Win

    Consulting firm Applications in Internet Time LLC has failed to persuade the full Federal Circuit to revive its patent infringement suit against Salesforce Inc.

  • June 12, 2026

    Jury Rejects Nielsen's TV Audience IP Case Against TVision

    A Delaware federal jury has cleared TVision Insights Inc. from claims by The Nielsen Co. that it infringed a patent covering audio recognition software with its products for getting data on TV audiences.

  • June 12, 2026

    UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London

    The past week in London has seen the FCA bring a claim against a fund manager it accused of providing investment services despite having been banned, an Ardmore unit sue a contractor two days before the construction group's collapse, and shipping and cruise giant MSC hit back at an entertainment company following separate intellectual property litigation in the U.S. Here, Law360 looks at these and other new claims in the U.K.

  • June 11, 2026

    Meta Must Face Porn Studio's IP Suit Over AI Training

    Meta Platforms Inc. can't toss a porn studio's copyright infringement suit accusing the social media giant of downloading the studio's films to train generative artificial intelligence models, a California federal judge ruled Thursday, saying the studio's allegations suffice to infer a "coordinated effort" by Meta to gather data.

  • June 11, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Won't Trade Detailed Verdicts For Efficiency

    The Federal Circuit has again faulted U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap's use of jury verdict forms that collapse all infringement allegations down to checking simply "yes" or "no," a decision attorneys say complicates how to present more individualized patent information without additional trial time.

  • June 11, 2026

    OpenAI Says High Court Curbed Some News Org IP Claims

    OpenAI told a New York federal judge Thursday that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Cox v. Sony decision bars a contributory infringement claim brought by four news companies accusing the artificial intelligence company of using their copyrighted materials to train ChatGPT, saying the high court's ruling eliminates the legal theory on which the plaintiffs rely.

  • June 11, 2026

    Altria Can't Halt ITC Patent Case It Calls Unconstitutional

    A Virginia federal judge on Thursday denied Altria's motion for a preliminary injunction blocking a U.S. International Trade Commission vaping patent suit against it by Juul, ruling that Altria is unlikely to succeed in its arguments that ITC patent proceedings are unconstitutional.

  • June 11, 2026

    Corteva Strikes $85M Deal In Farmer Pesticide Antitrust MDL

    A group of farmers have asked a North Carolina federal judge to preliminarily approve an $85 million settlement with Corteva Inc. to resolve antitrust claims that the company used loyalty rebate programs to artificially extend their patent monopolies over certain pesticides. 

  • June 11, 2026

    Amazon Didn't Infringe 'The Love Zone' TM With TV Show

    A Manhattan federal judge has dismissed a suit brought by a New York radio personality who hosts a show called "The Love Zone" against Amazon Studios and Paramount over a television episode that featured a fictional radio show of the same name, saying there wasn't a risk that the episode would harm the reputation of the real-life radio show.

  • June 11, 2026

    Sports Tech Company Calls Rival's Licensing Claims False

    Genius Sports has accused Panda Interactive in Delaware federal court of falsely claiming licensing deals in several states, connections with sportsbooks, and production of NFL-related content, the latest act in a multiyear legal battle between the rival sports tech companies.

  • June 11, 2026

    Bank Alleges Former VP Took Trade Secrets To Competitor

    Massachusetts regional bank Salem Five on Thursday accused a former vice president for institutional banking of printing hundreds of documents containing confidential and trade secret information before departing for an identical role at a competitor in April.

  • June 11, 2026

    DJI Says Insta360's Gimbal Cameras 'Blatantly Copy' Its Own

    Drone maker DJI Technology Co. filed a pair of patent infringement suits in Texas federal court alleging Insta360's new Luna line of handheld gimbal cameras "blatantly copy DJI's patented inventions wholesale."

  • June 11, 2026

    Magistrate Judge Suggests Injunction On 'Blippi' Fakes

    A federal magistrate judge has recommended permanently enjoining a Florida company from infringing trademarks on the children's show "Blippi," agreeing with the U.K.-based business that makes the show that the Florida company's Blippi impersonators were infringing.

  • June 11, 2026

    Miss America CEO Wants Ex-Atty Barred From Court

    The CEO of Miss America and companies linked to the pageant asked a Florida federal court on Thursday to bar their former counsel Carlton Fields from a status conference in their litigation over Miss America's bankruptcy, arguing the firm is not a party and is no longer counsel of record.

  • June 11, 2026

    Moderna Says New COVID Vax Doesn't Infringe BioNTech IP

    Moderna has pushed back at BioNTech's patent infringement lawsuit accusing its newer COVID-19 vaccine of exploiting BioNTech's own technology, saying that it never infringed and that the patent was invalid to begin with.

  • June 11, 2026

    3rd Circ. Asks How Legal Tech AI Tool Differed From Westlaw

    A Third Circuit panel grilled ROSS Intelligence's attorney Thursday over whether the defunct legal tech startup's use of Westlaw headnotes to train an artificial intelligence-powered legal research tool was truly transformative, repeatedly asking counsel to explain how the product differed from Westlaw.

  • June 11, 2026

    BofA Prevails In Authentication Patent Case At Fed. Circ.

    A user authentication patent owner that sued Bank of America for infringement lost its challenge to how a Texas federal court interpreted a key patent term, after the Federal Circuit on Thursday backed the lower court's claim construction.

  • June 11, 2026

    7th Circ. Affirms Grunt Style's $739K Army Motto TM Award

    The Seventh Circuit has upheld a jury verdict that awarded Chicago T-shirt company Grunt Style LLC $739,000 against another company for infringing its trademark of the U.S. Army slogan "This We'll Defend," saying that when it comes down to it, the case is about which company started using the mark first.

  • June 11, 2026

    Joe Gibbs Racing Can Fuel Up Suit Against NASCAR Rival

    NASCAR team Joe Gibbs Racing LLC can augment its trade secrets lawsuit against a former competition director and the rival racing company that hired him, after a North Carolina federal court found that the proposed amendments aren't pointless.

  • June 11, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Changes Process For Some Full-Panel Reviews

    The Federal Circuit now requires the authoring judge to notify all panel members about nonprocedural motions, including motions for extensions of time and withdrawal of counsel, according to internal documents.

  • June 10, 2026

    NCAA Athletes Fight To Limit Review Of Third-Party NIL Deals

    College athletes urged a California federal magistrate judge Wednesday to find their deals with multimedia rights companies and third-party brand sponsors aren't subject to oversight by the College Sports Commission, a new entity created following the NCAA's landmark $2.78 billion name, image and likeness settlement.

  • June 10, 2026

    PTAB Invalidates Inari Embolism Treatment Patent

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has invalidated the entirety of an Inari Medical Inc. patent covering the company's thrombectomy products, in a challenge brought by Imperative Care Inc.

  • June 10, 2026

    Influencer Says Underwear Co. Posted Lewd Deepfake

    A lifestyle content creator has sued body-inclusivity-oriented underwear company EBY Inc., claiming that while she had agreed to be a brand ambassador, the company used artificial intelligence to create a "deepfake" version of her and then used it to post a video where she appeared partially nude.

Expert Analysis

  • DTSA Data Shows Hidden Value Of Ex Parte Seizure Filings

    Author Photo

    Ten years of Defend Trade Secrets Act data indicate that although there is a low success rate for civil seizure applications, intellectual property litigators should continue filing them anyway in order to better their odds of obtaining other provisional relief, say attorneys at Reed Smith.

  • Becoming The Biz-Savvy GC That Portfolio Companies Need

    Author Photo

    Candidates for general counsel roles at private equity-backed portfolio companies should prioritize proving their sector-specific experience, commercial judgment and ease with uncertainty — and attorneys hoping to be candidates in five to 10 years should start working on those skills now, says Dimitri Mastrocola at Major Lindsey.

  • AI Agents Will Test The Bounds Of Expert Witness Rules

    Author Photo

    Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence does not address whether a testifying expert must be human, but as the rule’s amended admissibility framework intersects with the accelerating capabilities of agentic AI, courts may be forced to confront whether AI-generated expertise fits within existing evidentiary doctrine, says Steven Cordero at Akerman.

  • Reel Justice: 'Project Hail Mary' Can Aid Cross-Examination

    Author Photo

    In the new science fiction film, "Project Hail Mary," a character understood that survival depended on eliminating ambiguity — a useful lesson that trial lawyers can implement by asking statements that are delivered in the form of a question during cross-examination, says Veronica Finkelstein at Wilmington University.

  • Series

    Judges On AI: How Courts Can Survive The Tech Revolution

    Author Photo

    Colorado Supreme Court Justice Maria Berkenkotter and Colorado Court of Appeals Judge Lino Lipinsky de Orlov discuss how artificial intelligence has already fundamentally altered the legal system and offer tips for courts navigating deepfakes, hallucinations and a gap in access to AI tools.

  • 'Skinny Label' Arguments Spotlight Induced Infringement Risk

    Author Photo

    Recent oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in Hikma Pharmaceuticals v. Amarin Pharma highlight the uncertain boundary between lawful generic competition through so-called skinny labels and induced patent infringement, with potential implications for patent holders’ communication, enforcement and causation strategies across industries, says Anton Hopen at Trenam.

  • What Jury Holdouts Can Teach Trial Lawyers About Strategy

    Author Photo

    Though a hung jury can be a disappointment, a psychological understanding of jury holdouts can help trial lawyers shape their damages arguments and understand leadership and group composition as a function of jury selection, says Clint Townson at Townson Litigation.

  • Model Jury Instructions Provide Next Step In Aligning DTSA

    Author Photo

    As the Defend Trade Secrets Act turns 10, new model jury instructions published by the Sedona Conference map emerging issues and jurisdictional splits, representing a significant step toward harmonizing DTSA trial practice, says Amy Candido at Simpson Thacher.

  • Exploring The Legal Gray Area Around AI Voices In Music

    Author Photo

    The growing prevalence of AI music on online platforms highlights unique legal questions and ambiguities surrounding the usage of artificial intelligence to create accurate voice clones of existing singers, says Michael Maicher at Volpe Koenig.

  • 3 AI Adoption Mistakes GCs Should Avoid

    Author Photo

    The pressure in-house legal teams face to quickly adopt artificial intelligence tools, combined with budget constraints and the need to evaluate a crowded market of options, sets the stage for implementation mistakes that are often difficult to undo, says former 23andMe general counsel Guy Chayoun.

  • Framing AI Risk Management In The Art World

    Author Photo

    With gallery professionals indicating a widening gap between operational adoption of artificial intelligence and cultural acceptance of AI as an art medium, certain intellectual property, privacy and governance considerations are becoming critical for art industry stakeholders, say attorneys at Holland & Knight.

  • Series

    Playing Basketball Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    My grandfather used to say "I wear your jersey" as shorthand for wholly committing to support someone with loyalty and integrity — ideals that have shaped my life on the basketball court and in legal practice, says Tracy Schimelfenig at Schimelfenig Legal.

  • Salt-N-Pepa Suit May Shake Up Music Copyright Issue

    Author Photo

    James v. UMG Recordings is a copyright termination rights case that provides an opportunity for the Second Circuit to make concrete choices about grant language, authorship, work-for-hire status and survival of derivative works, says attorney Abdul Abdullahi.

  • Series

    The Biz Court Digest: Georgia Court Has Business On Its Mind

    Author Photo

    Thanks to recent legislation, the Georgia State-wide Business Court will soon offer business litigants greater access to the court than ever before, further enhancing the court's emphasis on efficiency, predictability and accessibility for sophisticated commercial disputes, says former GSBC judge Walt Davis at Jones Day.

  • Opinion

    USPTO Must Address The Right Question In Sanofi Case

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Appeals Review Panel's questions in Ex parte Baurin indicate recognition of broader doctrinal issues, but rather than approaching from separate angles, the panel should concentrate on a single fundamental question about obviousness-type double patenting, says Jeremy Lowe at Spencer Fane.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.