Expert Analysis

• Challenging Gov't Use Of Nontraditional White Collar Tools

  

  As the government prosecutes white collar cases with an ever-increasing reliance on nontraditional tools — including wiretaps, cooperating witnesses and racketeering charges — defense attorneys must understand how to mount effective defenses against such tools, say Glenn MacKinlay and Dean Elwell at McCarter & English.

• Handling Hostile Depositions: Keep Calm And Make A Record

  

  When depositions turn contentious, attorneys should, among other strategies, maintain a professional demeanor and note any objectionable conduct on the record, thereby increasing chances of a favorable outcome for the client while preserving the integrity of the legal process, say attorneys at Steptoe & Johnson.

• 5 Ways Firms Can Rethink Office Design In A Hybrid World

  

  As workplaces across the country adapt to flexible work, law firms must prioritize individuality, amenities and technology in office design, says Kristin Cerutti at Nelson Worldwide.

• VLSI V. Intel Saga Points To Conflicting Patent Guidance

  

  A recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision is the latest ruling in a hotly contested case between VLSI and Intel, showcasing that our current patent system has created a patchwork of conflicting guidance that prevents innovators from a quick and cost-efficient solution to their problems, says Ashley Moore at Michelman & Robinson.

• Opinion

  Bar Score Is Best Hiring Metric Post-Affirmative Action

  

  After the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling striking down affirmative action admissions policies, law firms looking to foster diversity in hiring should view an applicant's Multistate Bar Examination score as the best metric of legal ability — over law school name or GPA, says attorney Alice Griffin.

• Defense Counsel Sentencing Lessons From Holmes Case

  

  The recent imprisonment of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes highlights fundamental but sometimes overlooked sentencing practice points for white collar defense attorneys, from instilling a sense of narrative urgency in court submissions to researching potential prison facilities, says Jack Sharman at Lightfoot Franklin.

• Piecing Together The Blockchain Evidentiary Hurdles

  

  There are common challenges to introducing blockchain evidence at trial and a lack of uniformity in evidentiary codes at the state and federal levels means litigants must carefully navigate the uncertain blockchain puzzle, says Brett Sager at Ehrenstein Sager.

• Ghosting In BigLaw: How To Come Back From Lack Of Feedback

  

  Junior associates can feel powerless when senior colleagues cut off contact instead of providing useful feedback, but young attorneys can get back on track by focusing on practical professional development and reexamining their career priorities, says Rachel Patterson at Orrick.

• Post-Ciminelli Predictions On Right-To-Control Convictions

  

  The recent Second Circuit filings in Binday suggest that the government will fight to preserve its right-to-control convictions in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's Ciminelli decision, and offer clues about key issues that will drive post-Ciminelli litigation, say attorneys at Debevoise.

• Steps To Success For Senior Associates

  Excerpt from Practical Guidance

  

  Adriana Paris at Rissman Barrett discusses the increased responsibilities and opportunities that becoming a senior associate brings and what attorneys in this role should prioritize to flourish in this stressful but rewarding next level in their careers.

• Legal Profession Must Do More For Lawyers With Disabilities

  

  At the start of Disability Pride month, Rosalyn Richter at Arnold & Porter looks at why lawyers with disabilities are significantly underrepresented in private practice, asserting that law firms and other employers must do more to conquer the implicit bias that deters attorneys from seeking accommodations.

• Opinion

  The Supreme Court Can't Fix The SEC's In-House Court Issue

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit's decision in Jarkesy v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that, if upheld, could shutter the in-house courts used by the SEC to litigate many of its enforcement cases, but a constitutional challenge to these courts is probably too blunt an instrument for the job, says David Slovick at Barnes & Thornburg.

• Perspectives

  Service Members Should Have Right To Unanimous Verdicts

  

  As several recent cases exemplify, service members can be convicted of crimes by nonunanimous juries in military courts and cannot appeal such verdicts, despite Supreme Court precedent from recent years — a glaring constitutional error that Congress should rectify expeditiously, says Kevin Carroll at Hughes Hubbard.

• Opinion

  Appellate Funding Disclosure: No Mandate Is Right Choice

  

  The Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules' recent decision, forgoing a mandatory disclosure rule for litigation funding in federal appeals, is prudent, as third-party funding is only involved in a minuscule number of federal cases, and courts have ample authority to obtain funding information if necessary, says Stewart Ackerly at Statera Capital.

• Justices' Test For Redacted Confessions Casts Context Aside

  

  The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Samia v. U.S., allowing co-defendant confessions with certain redactions to be admitted as evidence in a joint trial, puts form over substance by focusing on the superficial aspects of a confession, which may ultimately erode Sixth Amendment protections, says Michael McCarthy at Kendall Brill.