Trials

  • September 23, 2026

    Fla. Woman Gets $7.6M In Leg Amputation Med Mal Suit

    A Florida jury has awarded a woman $7.6 million after finding that her doctors were negligent and failed to recognize a medical emergency threatening her leg, resulting in its amputation.

  • September 23, 2026

    Legal Groups Back Firm In NC High Court Malpractice Appeal

    Legal advocacy groups are standing behind the law firm Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo LLP in asking North Carolina's highest court to find that the state's four-year statute of repose on legal malpractice claims creates an immovable end-date to liability.

  • September 23, 2026

    Judge Won't Overturn $5M American Axle Win In Patent Case

    Neapco Holdings LLC has lost its bid to dodge paying a $5.2 million award in a patent suit from American Axle after a Delaware federal judge found that there was enough evidence to back the jury's finding and that the monetary amount wasn't excessive.

  • September 23, 2026

    Weinstein Sentenced To 15 Years After NY Trials

    A New York state judge on Wednesday sentenced Harvey Weinstein to 15 years for sexually assaulting "Project Runway" production assistant Miriam Haley, following a series of trials against the already-imprisoned former Hollywood producer.

  • September 22, 2026

    Meta Flaunts 'Abuse' Of Atty-Client Privilege, Judge Told

    A California federal judge ordered Meta on Tuesday to rereview privilege designations on 300 documents in social media addiction litigation, after plaintiffs' lawyers cited a "culture of privilege abuse" epitomized by Instagram swag hats embroidered with "a/c priv" — the shorthand used to log withheld documents.

  • September 22, 2026

    Big Tech Backs Samsung At Fed. Circ. Over Patent Injunctions

    Top technology companies and various industry groups have urged the Federal Circuit to deny Collision Communications an injunction after the patent owner's $445.5 million infringement verdict against Samsung, saying an injunction would undermine U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

  • September 22, 2026

    UMass Hospital Co. Beats Ex-VP's COVID Vaccine Firing Claim

    A jury cleared a central Massachusetts hospital system of liability for terminating a compliance officer who refused a COVID-19 shot, finding Tuesday she failed to show a sincere religious belief against vaccination.

  • September 22, 2026

    Yale, Biohaven Seek $23M Atty Fee After Trade Secrets Win

    Yale University and Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd. have requested attorney fees topping $23.1 million, plus $2 million each in exemplary damages, after winning a $4 million trial verdict, though both entities are also seeking a new trial to readdress damages on trade secrets and contract breach claims.

  • September 22, 2026

    Centripetal Asks Justices To Revive $2.6B Cisco Patent Case

    Centripetal Networks LLC has told the U.S. Supreme Court that a decision clearing Cisco Systems Inc. of infringing its cybersecurity patents in a $2.6 billion case was wrongly based on a new claim construction that a judge entered late in the case, without letting Centripetal respond.

  • September 22, 2026

    1st Circ. Affirms Prison Term, Repayment In Med Bill Scheme

    The First Circuit affirmed a lower court's calculations behind a 99-month prison sentence and $6.5 million restitution order for a psychiatrist convicted of submitting $19 million in claims to insurers for thousands of sessions that never took place.

  • September 22, 2026

    Mass. Justices Grant New Trial In Fatal Parade Shooting

    Massachusetts' top court ordered a new trial Tuesday for a man accused of fatally shooting a bystander during a parade, ruling that trace amounts of gunshot residue found on his body were improperly admitted as evidence. 

  • September 22, 2026

    Law Firm Says Illinois Tollway Owes Limo-Crash Defense Fees

    The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority is being sued in Illinois state court by a Chicago law firm claiming the agency has failed to pay attorney fees for its defense in litigation over a catastrophic 2016 limousine crash.

  • September 22, 2026

    Womble Bond Can't Quit Dutch Client With TM Trial Looming

    Womble Bond Dickinson can't withdraw from a trademark feud that's dragged on for more than five years between U.S. and Dutch software companies, a North Carolina federal judge ruled, saying the firm's exit at this late stage "would be completely disruptive."

  • September 22, 2026

    Judge Sinks Patent Judgments Against Chilisin In Cyntec Suit

    A California federal judge has nullified judgments against Chilisin Electronics Corp. in a patent case from Cyntec Co. over Cyntec's failure to disclose an agreement to license a pair of its patents to Apple, while also agreeing to sanction Cyntec's counsel.

  • September 21, 2026

    Tesla Atty Misled Witness Days Before Bias Trial, Judge Hears

    The California Civil Rights Department asked a California judge for a protective order Monday on the first day of a bench trial over claims Tesla Inc. fostered racism at its Fremont factory, after a witness testified that an in-house Tesla attorney recently called him and misled him into believing he represented the agency.

  • September 21, 2026

    Drexel Prof's Class Format Change Was Retaliation, Jury Told

    Counsel for a Drexel University philosophy professor on Monday told a Philadelphia jury that the teacher faced retaliation for winning a previous equal pay lawsuit against the college in the form of having an upper level course she teaches switched from in-person to online instruction.

  • September 21, 2026

    Insider Critiques Of Meta Came From Ignorance, Jury Told

    A Meta vice president testified before a New Mexico state jury Monday that, "with all due respect," criticisms of the company's data handling from investigation partner Gibson Dunn and from then-Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg were born of a lack of understanding.

  • September 21, 2026

    Telecom Giants Seek Fees For 'Unprincipled' Asus Patent Suit

    AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile asked a Texas federal judge on Monday for attorney fees after they defeated an infringement suit over wireless communications patents, accusing Asus Technology Licensing Inc. and the other plaintiffs of "an aggressive and unprincipled litigation campaign."

  • September 21, 2026

    Deal Resolves Oil Pump Case After Final Albright Patent Trial

    Texas-based manufacturer UTEX Industries and GD Energy Products have told a Texas federal judge they've agreed to the dismissal of a suit where a jury found last month that GD Energy didn't infringe a patent covering a packing assembly for pumps used in the oil and gas industry.

  • September 21, 2026

    4th Circ. Won't Rethink Cutting $22M Wells Fargo Judgment

    The Fourth Circuit declined Monday to reconsider its decision cutting nearly $2.9 million from a former Wells Fargo employee's $22 million jury award and overturning portions of the verdict in his disability discrimination suit against the financial giant.

  • September 21, 2026

    Ex-NFL Player Gets New Trial In $328M Medicare Fraud Case

    A Texas federal judge has granted a new trial for a former NFL player convicted in a $328 million Medicare billing scheme, finding that the government presented unreliable testimony and did not identify the alleged lies the defendant used to influence physicians.

  • September 21, 2026

    She Has A Point: Fenwick's Jessica Kaempf

    Jessica Kaempf of Fenwick & West LLP is a pragmatic yet tenacious attorney whose representation of her clients has earned her plaudits from Kathi Vidal of Winston Taylor, who praised Kaempf as part of a Law360 series celebrating women litigators.

  • September 21, 2026

    NEC Hits Anker With New Patent Suit, Days Before EDTX Trial

    Japan-based electronics company NEC Corp. has sued over home security products made by Chinese rival Anker Innovations, accusing it of infringing six image processing patents, days before another NEC suit against Anker on similar patents is set for trial in Texas.

  • September 21, 2026

    Judge Reduces $38.9M Beyond Meat TM Verdict

    A Massachusetts judge slashed a $38.9 million trademark infringement verdict against Beyond Meat Inc. for an advertising campaign that used the slogan "Great Taste, Plant Based" after finding that the trademark owner failed to prove all of its damages.

  • September 21, 2026

    Ill. Court Won't Undo $41M Stroke Malpractice Verdict

    An Illinois appeals panel won't upend a $41 million verdict against OSF Healthcare System in a suit over a man's debilitating stroke, saying Illinois law tolls the statute of limitations based on the plaintiff's disability, regardless of if his wife or attorneys could have filed suit.

Expert Analysis

  • Mitigating The Risk Of Antiestablishment Jurors

    Author Photo

    The legal battles currently embroiling social media companies underscore that jurors with anti-corporate bias and conspiratorial thinking patterns pose myriad risks to corporate defendants, and defense counsel should adapt their trial strategies accordingly, say consultants at Persuasion Strategies.

  • Series

    Being In A Band Made Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Playing shows in storied New York City venues and rehearsing with my bandmates in poorly ventilated rooms helped develop the professional qualities I rely on as a litigator, including an ability to collaborate with strong-minded equals and the determination to treat each client with singular focus, says Eliad Shapiro at Herrick Feinstein.

  • Opinion

    Correctional Healthcare Requires Clearer Legal Standards

    Author Photo

    As the correctional healthcare industry increasingly faces financial instability due to litigation, the U.S. Bureau of Prisons should develop clear standards for constitutionally adequate care for incarcerated patients, says Susanne Moore at Blackstone Trial Group.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Surviving A Long Trial

    Author Photo

    Most of law school trial advocacy is geared toward the sprint of trying a short case, but beyond managing a cross-examination or closing argument, effectively handling the marathon of a lengthy trial requires the ability to maintain composure, organization and credibility with the jury, says Mihir Elchuri at Hirschler.

  • Calif. Justices' Ruling Reshapes Midcase Appeal Strategy

    Author Photo

    The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants holds that voluntary dismissal cannot be used as a shortcut to appellate review of interlocutory orders, resolving a long-running appellate split and pushing litigants to use alternative procedural tools, says Josh Patashnik at Ashurst Perkins Coie.

  • Reel Justice: 'Disclosure Day' Teaches Attys To Listen

    Author Photo

    The underlying message in “Disclosure Day” suggests that communication often breaks down because of a failure to hear and understand, highlighting why a lawyer's ability to listen is not ancillary to their practice — it is what makes effective representation and justice possible, says Veronica Finkelstein at Widener-Delaware Law.

  • Fed. Circ.'s Thermostat Ruling Holds Patent Jury Trial Lessons

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Ollnova v. Ecobee, throwing out a $11.5 million patent infringement award, clarifies key rules for jury verdict forms and sends an important message on patent subject matter eligibility, says Bijal Vakil at Skadden.

  • Series

    Going To Hardcore Shows Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    While government contracts law and the hardcore scene may seem entirely unrelated, in my experience, both are about community, focus, being prepared for the unexpected and managing chaos, says Isaac Natter at Fluet.

  • 9th Circ. Ruling Exposes A Flaw In Federal Trade Secrets Law

    Author Photo

    The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Comet Technologies v. XP Power, addressing a difference between the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and California's Uniform Trade Secrets Act, shows why the DTSA's requirement that claimed trade secrets not be readily ascertainable is inherently problematic, say attorneys at Buchalter.

  • Fla. Justices Give Trial Judges More Dismissal Discretion

    Author Photo

    The Florida Supreme Court's recent decision in Publix Supermarkets Inc. v. Goga confirmed that appellate courts should not apply a heightened standard when reviewing severe sanctions for fraud on the court, granting greater deference to trial courts, says Brent Hartman at RumbergerKirk.

  • Opinion

    After Monsanto, Defense Bar Must Build Case Against Lohr

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Monsanto v. Durnell has helped to demolish the foundation for its problematic 1996 ruling in Medtronic v. Lohr — so now defense counsel should lay the groundwork for the high court to overturn Lohr, say attorneys at Blank Rome.

  • 9th Circ. Rule Block Unlikely To Deter FinCEN Cartel Focus

    Author Photo

    The Ninth Circuit recently blocked the Financial Crimes Enforcement Unit's border cash reporting rule, interpreting it as an impermissible use of an emergency anti-money laundering tool, but regulators are more likely to see the opinion as a road map for building a more defensible rule, say attorneys at Bradley Arant.

  • Series

    Being A Sommelier Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Being a sommelier has quietly shaped how I practice law by changing the way I think, communicate and connect with people, and offers a constant reminder that expertise is about making your knowledge useful and accessible to others, says Kara Du at Sheppard.

  • Series

    Teaching SEC Investigations Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Instructing a law school course on U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigations has made me a more thoughtful, deliberate practitioner because it requires me to continually reassess and challenge what I know about securities law enforcement, how I know it and how best to explain it, says David Chase at Miami Law.

  • Monsanto Ruling Bolsters Generic Drug Labeling Preemption

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell concerns herbicide labeling regulated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, but also carries weighty implications for preemption of state law labeling claims against drug manufacturers, say Terry Henry and Ann Querns at Blank Rome and Melanie Leney at Aurobindo Pharma.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Trials archive.