Trials

  • December 16, 2025

    LA Angels' Role In Pitcher's Fatal Overdose Goes To Jury

    A California state jury began deliberations Tuesday in a civil suit accusing the Los Angeles Angels of contributing to the fatal overdose of pitcher Tyler Skaggs, who died while the team was traveling for an away game from a combination of alcohol and fentanyl-laced pills provided by the team's communications director.

  • December 16, 2025

    10th Circ. Tosses Manslaughter Charge Over Jury Instructions

    The Tenth Circuit on Tuesday threw out a manslaughter case against a Republican former member of the Oklahoma Legislature whose motorcycle crash resulted in his girlfriend's death, finding that because a judge refused to elaborate on legal terms at issue in the case, a jury was not properly instructed on the law.

  • December 16, 2025

    SEC Says No New 'Scalping' Trial For Penny Stock Trader

    A penny stock trader found liable for a $2.5 million fraud scheme known as scalping should not get a new trial, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said, arguing that the trader's complaints about the verdict form came too late.

  • December 16, 2025

    PTAB Cuts X-Ray Patent Claims After Fed. Circ. Remand

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found that three claims that Sigray Inc. challenged in a Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy Inc. X-ray imaging patent were invalid after the Federal Circuit told it to take another look at the claims.

  • December 16, 2025

    Va. Judge Advances Most Claims In Stelara Antitrust Case

    A Virginia federal judge has allowed health insurer CareFirst's anticompetition and patent fraud claims against Johnson & Johnson to move forward in a case alleging anticompetitive behavior in relation to the immunosuppressive drug Stelara, while letting the pharmaceutical giant escape some claims of misrepresentation.

  • December 16, 2025

    Wash. AG's Native Cold Case Unit Gets First Conviction

    The Washington State Attorney General's Office has announced that its recently established task force unit to investigate cold case homicides involving Indigenous people has secured its first guilty plea in a previously unsolved criminal case.

  • December 16, 2025

    Trucking Co. Wants $44M I-35 Pileup Verdict Wiped Out

    A Missouri-based trucking company on Tuesday asked a Texas state court for a take-nothing judgment less than a week after a Dallas jury found it liable for the death of a motorist in a February 2021 pileup and awarded the man's family $44 million.

  • December 16, 2025

    $1.7M Verdict Tainted By Confusion, NJ Housing Agency Says

    Camden, New Jersey's housing authority asked a Garden State federal court for a new trial after a jury awarded $1.7 million to former and current employees who claimed they were terminated for raising concerns about corruption, arguing that the jury improperly decided questions of law and that the jury charges and verdict sheet contradicted each other.

  • December 16, 2025

    Jury Says Magnolia Medical Is Owed $1.6M After Patent Trial

    A Delaware federal jury on Tuesday morning found that Magnolia Medical Technologies Inc. is entitled to nearly $1.6 million after Kurin Inc. infringed its patents tied to devices meant for drawing blood.

  • December 16, 2025

    FCA In 2025: Trump, A Qui Tam Clash And Whopping Penalties

    From a 10-figure verdict to shifting Justice Department enforcement priorities, Law360 looks at the major FCA developments of the year.

  • December 15, 2025

    LA Angels Did Nothing To Prevent Pitcher's Death, Jury Told

    The Los Angeles Angels "did absolutely nothing" to stop its employee from distributing illicit drugs to Tyler Skaggs, plaintiffs' counsel told California jurors Monday during closing arguments in his family's wrongful death lawsuit, while an Angels attorney argued that the pitcher was responsible for his own overdose death. 

  • December 15, 2025

    Palin Can't Get 3rd Trial In NYT Defamation Case

    A New York federal judge on Monday denied Sarah Palin's attempt for another redo of her libel trial against The New York Times, saying her lawyers "seriously misconstrued" a Second Circuit decision as reducing what she had to prove at trial.

  • December 15, 2025

    Ditching SUV Isn't Evidence Tampering, Conn. Justices Say

    The Connecticut Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a man accused of ditching his SUV after hitting and killing a pedestrian cannot face charges of evidence tampering because he did not alter the vehicle after he moved it into a parking lot, in plain view of a busy street.

  • December 15, 2025

    One Sotheby's Agent Found Guilty Of $3.7M Theft

    A jury on Friday returned a guilty verdict for a former One Sotheby's International Realty agent who was accused of stealing $3.7 million in proceeds from the sale of a Miami-area beachfront luxury condo.

  • December 15, 2025

    Ex-BAE Engineer Loses Retaliation Claim In Md. Jury Trial

    A former engineer for BAE Systems did not prove that he engaged in protected activity in his suit claiming that the company fired him after raising concerns about his overtime pay, a Maryland federal jury found Friday.

  • December 15, 2025

    Judge Willing To Take 'Heat' For Blocking ICE Arrest, Jury Told

    A Wisconsin judge was willing to "take the heat" for using a staff hallway to usher an unauthorized immigrant out of her courtroom, a federal jury heard Monday, as a defense attorney argued she can't be found guilty by association just because someone in her courtroom tried to flee immigration agents.

  • December 15, 2025

    1st Circ. Backs Mass. High Court In Juror Race Appeal

    The First Circuit has found that the dismissal of one of the only jurors of color from a 1999 murder trial did not run afoul of federal precedent because her occupation as a guidance counselor, not her race, led prosecutors to request that she be tossed from the jury pool.

  • December 15, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Won't Revive Bard Patents In AngioDynamics Row

    The Federal Circuit on Monday refused to revive claims in C.R. Bard patents on implanted catheter receptacles that were challenged by AngioDynamics, backing a Delaware federal court's finding that the claims were anticipated.

  • December 15, 2025

    Yale Hospital Hit With $32M Baby Formula Death Verdict

    A Connecticut judge has hit Yale University and Yale New Haven Hospital with a nearly $32 million verdict over the death of a premature baby, finding doctors failed to obtain either informed consent, or any consent, before feeding the infant a diet fortified by a product produced from cow's milk.

  • December 15, 2025

    The Top Patent Decisions Of 2025

    The Federal Circuit decided its first en banc utility patent case in years and expanded who can use the U.S. International Trade Commission, while both the appeals court and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office took on the eligibility of AI patents. Here's a look at the top patent decisions of 2025.

  • December 15, 2025

    Michelin Owes $220M In Deadly Car Crash Suit

    A New Mexico state jury has issued a $220 million verdict against Michelin North America Inc. in a suit alleging one of its tires was defective and led to a head-on collision that killed three members of a Texas family.

  • December 15, 2025

    High Court Will Review Racial Bias In Miss. Jury Strikes

    The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear its second case involving the same Mississippi prosecutor's peremptory strikes of Black prospective jurors in a Black defendant's death penalty case — and the same state judge's approval of those strikes.

  • December 12, 2025

    Boeing Unit Owes $2.5M In Employment Bias Trial

    A Kansas federal jury has said Spirit AeroSystems Inc. must pay a former employee, a white mechanic, $2.5 million for firing him after a period of sustained conflict with a Hispanic employee that eventually led the mechanic to call the police.

  • December 12, 2025

    J&J Hit With $40M Verdict In Bellwether Talc Trial In LA

    A Los Angeles jury on Friday hit Johnson & Johnson with a $40 million verdict after a month-long bellwether trial, finding its talc products were a substantial factor in causing two women's ovarian cancer but declining to award punitive damages against J&J, which is facing thousands of talc claims nationwide.

  • December 12, 2025

    Chubb Unit Needn't Cover Tech CEO's Living Expense Claim

    A Chubb unit doesn't owe millions in coverage to a software company CEO and his wife for living expenses related to a 2017 water damage claim, a California federal court ruled, saying the couple's suit is barred by their property policy's one-year suit limitation provision.

Expert Analysis

  • Agentic AI Puts A New Twist On Attorney Ethics Obligations

    Author Photo

    As lawyers increasingly use autonomous artificial intelligence agents, disciplinary authorities must decide whether attorney responsibility for an AI-caused legal ethics violation is personal or supervisory, and firms must enact strong policies regarding agentic AI use and supervision, says Grace Wynn at HWG.

  • Series

    Being A Professional Wrestler Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Pursuing my childhood dream of being a professional wrestler has taught me important legal career lessons about communication, adaptability, oral advocacy and professionalism, says Christopher Freiberg at Midwest Disability.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Adapting To The Age Of AI

    Author Photo

    Though law school may not have specifically taught us how to use generative artificial intelligence to help with our daily legal tasks, it did provide us the mental building blocks necessary for adapting to this new technology — and the judgment to discern what shouldn’t be automated, says Pamela Dorian at Cozen O'Connor.

  • Ch. 11 Ruling Voiding $2M Litigation Funding Sends A Warning

    Author Photo

    A recent Texas bankruptcy court decision that a postconfirmation litigation trust has no obligations to repay a completely drawn down $2 million litigation funding agreement serves as a warning for estate administrators and funders to properly disclose the intended financing, say attorneys at Kleinberg Kaplan.

  • Tesla Verdict May Set New Liability Benchmarks For AV Suits

    Author Photo

    The recent jury verdict in Benavides v. Tesla is notable not only for a massive payout — including $200 million in punitive damages — but because it apportions fault between the company's self-driving technology and the driver, inviting more scrutiny of automated vehicle marketing and technology, says Michael Avanesian at Avian Law Group.

  • Demystifying The Civil Procedure Rules Amendment Process

    Author Photo

    Every year, an advisory committee receives dozens of proposals to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most of which are never adopted — but a few pointers can help maximize the likelihood that an amendment will be adopted, says Josh Gardner at DLA Piper.

  • Reel Justice: 'Sorry, Baby' Shows Need For Sensitive Voir Dire

    Author Photo

    In the recent film “Sorry, Baby,” the protagonist is called for jury duty while still coming to terms with a crime she recently survived, illustrating why attorneys should adopt trauma-informed practices in voir dire to minimize the retraumatization of potential jurors, says Veronica Finkelstein at Wilmington University School of Law.

  • Parenting Skills That Can Help Lawyers Thrive Professionally

    Author Photo

    As kids head back to school, the time is ripe for lawyers who are parents to consider how they can incorporate their parenting skills to build a deep, meaningful and sustainable legal practice, say attorneys at Alston & Bird.

  • Series

    Teaching Trial Advocacy Makes Us Better Lawyers

    Author Photo

    Teaching trial advocacy skills to other lawyers makes us better litigators because it makes us question our default methods, connect to young attorneys with new perspectives and focus on the needs of the real people at the heart of every trial, say Reuben Guttman, Veronica Finkelstein and Joleen Youngers.

  • The Crucial Question Left Unanswered In EpicentRx Decision

    Author Photo

    The California Supreme Court recently issued its long-awaited decision in EpicentRx Inc. v. Superior Court, resolving a dispute regarding the enforceability of forum selection clauses, but the question remains whether private companies can trust that courts will continue to consistently enforce forum selection clauses in corporate charters, says John Yow at Yow PC.

  • MIT Bros.' Crypto Charges Provide Fraud Test Case For Gov't

    Author Photo

    As U.S. v. Peraire-Bueno, involving cryptocurrency fraud charges against brothers who graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, moves forward after surviving a motion to dismiss, the case provides an early example of how the government might use the federal fraud statutes to regulate decentralized networks, say attorneys at ArentFox Schiff.

  • 5 Key Steps To Prepare For Oral Arguments

    Author Photo

    Whether presenting oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court or a local county judge, effective preparation includes the same essential ingredients, from organizing arguments in blocks to maximizing the potential of mock exercises, says Allison Rocker at Baker McKenzie.

  • Why EpicentRx Ruling Is A Major Win For Business Certainty

    Author Photo

    The California Supreme Court's recent decision in EpicentRx v. Superior Court removes a significant source of uncertainty that plagued commercial litigation in California by clarifying that forum selection clauses shouldn't be invalidated solely because the selected forum lacks the right to a jury trial, say attorneys at Clark Hill.

  • 9th Circ. Finding That NFTs Are Goods Will Change TM Law

    Author Photo

    The Ninth Circuit's recent ruling in Yuga Labs v. Ripps establishes that NFTs have real, commercial value under U.S. federal trademark law, a new legal precedent that may significantly influence intellectual property enforcement and marketplace policies regarding digital assets going forward, say attorneys at Wilson Elser.

  • Series

    Adapting To Private Practice: From Texas AUSA To BigLaw

    Author Photo

    As I learned when I transitioned from an assistant U.S. attorney to a BigLaw partner, the move from government to private practice is not without its hurdles, but it offers immense potential for growth and the opportunity to use highly transferable skills developed in public service, says Jeffery Vaden at Bracewell.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Trials archive.