We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Big Name GCs Implore Congress To Boost Legal Aid Funding

By RJ Vogt | April 28, 2019, 8:02 PM EDT

General counsel from Walmart, Amazon, General Motors and more than 250 other American companies are urging Congress to increase federal funding for the Legal Services Corporation, the country’s largest single funder of civil legal aid, despite the Trump administration’s repeated calls to ax the program.

In a letter expected to go out Monday, the group noted that LSC grantees provide essential legal services to people who would otherwise face legal problems alone, including veterans, domestic violence survivors, natural disaster victims, elderly individuals, those impacted by the opioid crisis and more.

“The federal investment in civil legal aid brings our country closer to meeting its foundational promise of equal justice for all,” the letter states. “It is also good for business. As corporate leaders, we understand that the stability of our communities directly impacts the success of our companies.”

Signatories include Sean Edgett, general counsel for Twitter Inc.; Bradley Gayton, general counsel for Ford Motor Co.; David R. McAtee II, general counsel for AT&T Inc.; Craig Glidden, general counsel for General Motors Co.; Karen Roberts, general counsel for Walmart Inc.; and David Zapolsky, general counsel for Amazon.com Inc., among others.

Don Saunders, the National Legal Aid & Defender Association’s vice president of civil legal services, told Law360 that the letter underscores the “bipartisan or nonpartisan nature” of the program.

“I have no idea what party any of these people belong to, even the ones I work most closely with,” Saunders said. ”But they’re all interested in continuing federal support for the justice system.”

In March, President Donald Trump’s annual budget proposal said Congress should defund the organization, citing plans “to move the nation towards fiscal responsibility and to redefine the proper role of the federal government.”

As proof of the program’s supposedly wasteful spending, one White House budget document noted an October 2017 inspector general report that found LSC grantees spent $17,896 in unjustified expenditures for “floral arrangements, musical entertainment and cake orders” used to recruit private attorneys.

The bid is the most recent example of efforts to stymie the LSC, which have come up repeatedly over the past 40 years.

Click to view interactive version


But even as the president has sought to nix federally funded legal aid in each of his first three budgets, Congress has repeatedly ignored the call. In fact, lawmakers have actually increased LSC funding each time, appropriating $410 million for fiscal year 2018 and $415 million for fiscal year 2019.

This year, the organization requested $593 million, a sum that would make up roughly .01% of the administration’s highest-ever $4.7 trillion suggested national budget.

LSC critics have pointed out that many states provide their own legal aid funding, arguing that legal services issues are best handled on a local level.

The recent letter, however, noted that “particularly in the Southern and Mountain West states, an LSC grantee is often the only source of legal help for those that cannot afford private counsel.”

And even as pro bono practices aim to fill in the so-called “justice gap” between the represented and unrepresented masses, the general counsel pointed out that corporate assistance is “made possible by the structure and support network contributed by LSC grantees.”

“It’s not an indictment of the administration or anything else,” Saunders said of the letter. “It's just support for the role LSC plays in creating a strong business climate.”

A representative from the White House Office of Management and Budget did not respond to requests for comment.

Have a story idea for Access to Justice? Reach us at accesstojustice@law360.com.

--Editing by Katherine Rautenberg.