The Texas Supreme Court has delayed the effective date of rules for allowing non-attorneys to perform some legal services, saying it will take the extra time to "give due consideration to the comments received."
The rules for licensed legal paraprofessionals and court-access assistants approved in August were set to take effect at the start of December, following a comment period that would end Nov. 1.
Monday's order did not provide a new timeframe for the rules but said the delay was "pending further order of the court."
If enacted, the rules will allow licensed legal paraprofessionals and court-access assistants to offer some legal services on family law, estate planning, probate law and consumer debt law matters.
The decision comes after the State Bar of Texas proposed changes to the pending rules last September that would require court-access assistants to be supervised by a sponsoring agency such as a legal aid group.
The bar's rules would have also required professionals to have at least an associate degree, rather than just a high school diploma, and raised the required number of annual continuing legal education hours from 10 to 15.
The bar proposed mandating more language to inform clients of their rights and subjecting paraprofessionals to many of the same rules as those imposed on Texas lawyers.
The state Supreme Court proposed rules aimed at making legal services more accessible to low-income Texans.
The National Center for Access to Justice's justice index ranked Texas among the lowest of states for access to legal aid attorneys. According to the Texas Access to Justice Foundation, individuals in the state cannot earn more than $18,225 a year to qualify for free civil legal services, and a family of four must not earn more than $37,500.
--Additional reporting by Lynn LaRowe. Editing by Marygrace Anderson.
Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Law360
|The Practice of Law
Access to Justice
Aerospace & Defense
Appellate
Asset Management
Banking
Bankruptcy
Benefits
California
Cannabis
Capital Markets
Class Action
Colorado
Commercial Contracts
Competition
Compliance
Connecticut
Construction
Consumer Protection
Corporate
Criminal Practice
Cybersecurity & Privacy
Delaware
Employment
Energy
Environmental
Fintech
Florida
Food & Beverage
Georgia
Government Contracts
Health
Hospitality
Illinois
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Trade
Legal Ethics
Legal Industry
Life Sciences
Massachusetts
Media & Entertainment
Mergers & Acquisitions
Michigan
Native American
Law360 Pulse
|Business of Law
Law360 Authority
|Deep News & Analysis
Healthcare Authority
Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & ComplianceGlobal
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
This article has been saved to your Briefcase
This article has been added to your Saved Articles
Texas High Court Delays Rule Changes For Non-Atty Services
By Andrea Keckley | November 6, 2024, 4:04 PM EST · Listen to article