Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Illinois Department of Transportation
-
Utility | Filed: March 13, 2024 | Entered: April 05, 2024 Thomas v. Illinois Department of Transportation
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment | Illinois Central
Stay Lifted
Stay Lifted as of 3/13/24 with no settlement being reached at the conference and subsequently a schedule has been entered. (WG)
-
Minutes | Filed: April 01, 2024 | Entered: April 01, 2024 Meredith et al v. Illinois Department of Transportation
Civil Rights: Jobs | Illinois Central
Status Conference
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught: Status Conference held 4/1/2024 via telephone. Attorney John A. Baker present on behalf of Plaintiffs. AAG Robert Hogue III present on behalf of Defendant. Discussion held regarding status of discovery. Parties reminded of their option to consent to proceed before U S Magistrate Judge. Hearing adjourned. (Tape #SP-C 09:31.) (BL)
-
Order | Filed: March 28, 2024 | Entered: March 28, 2024 Thomas v. Illinois Department of Transportation
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment | Illinois Central
Order ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings 1 - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
TEXT ORDER by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley: The Court adopts the Discovery Plan 36 . Court adopts all deadlines as proposed including the following: Discovery due by 10/1/24. Dispositive Motions due by 12/2/24. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/10/25 at 3:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 4/28/25 at 9:00 AM, BOTH in Courtroom A before District Judge Shadid. The parties joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order is due on or before 3/31/2025. The Proposed Final Pretrial Order shall include as exhibits a list of each parties witnesses and whether they will appear in person or by video; a joint list of exhibits, if any, to which the parties agree to their admissibility; a list of exhibits to which a party objects and the basis for the objections; joint jury instructions on which the parties agree; and each partys own instructions to which another party objects. The combination of the joint instructions and each partys separately offered instructions should, in that partys view, constitute all the instructions the Court would give to the jury. If a party objects to another partys instruction, it should offer an alternative instruction, unless the party believes that the particular instruction should not be given at all. Motions in limine due on or before 3/17/2025 and responses thereto due on or before 3/31/25. Court stresses the importance of adhering to the schedule and procedures for requests to extend the schedule. The parties are expected to review Judge Hawley's Standing Order that was revised on 4/7/2022. Entered: 3/28/2024. (WG)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login