Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Missouri Department of Insurance
-
Order | Filed: February 28, 2013 | Entered: February 28, 2013 Hoelscher et al v. Huff et al
Insurance | Missouri Western
Order on Motion to Quash Order on Motion for Default Judgment Order on Motion to Vacate
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. In light of the Court's dismissal of Plaintiffs' Complaint, Plaintiffs' Motions for Default Judgment 44 45 46 47 are DENIED as moot. Defendant Markway's Motion to Quash 33 is DENIED as moot. Defendant Haymart's Motion to Vacate 58 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have failed to respond to Defendant Haymart's Motion. Plaintiffs have not shown that they complied with Rule 4(d)'s service of process requirements or rebutted Defendant's affidavit that he never received service. See Wright & Miller, § 1083 Principles of Construction of Rule 4, 4A Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1083 (3d ed.) ("the party on whose behalf service of process is made has the burden of establishing its validity when challenged"). The Court's Order of 12/20/12 is vacated insofar as it required Defendants to bear the costs of service and process. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached.(Smith, Fran)
-
Order | Filed: February 05, 2013 | Entered: February 05, 2013 Hoelscher et al v. Huff et al
Insurance | Missouri Western
Order on Motion to Dismiss Party
ORDER by Judge Nanette Laughrey. The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Service on Defendants is quashed. Plaintiffs have thirty (30) days to effect service of process or obtain a waiver of service against Defendants in accordance with the Federal and State Rules of Civil Procedure. Should Plaintiffs fail to effect service or obtain a waiver, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' request to amend their Complaint and gives Plaintiffs ten (10) days to file an Amended Complaint naming the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration as the proper party. 13 (Smith, Fran)
-
Order | Filed: January 28, 2013 | Entered: January 28, 2013 Hoelscher et al v. Huff et al
Insurance | Missouri Western
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time 60 is GRANTED. The following are due on or before February 12, 2013: Plaintiff's Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Miller's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 29 ; Plaintiffs' Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Markway's Motion to Quash 33 ; Plaintiffs' Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Bernskoetter's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 40 ; Plaintiffs' Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Jansen's Motion to Dismiss 42 ; Plaintiffs' Reply Suggestions to their Motions for Default Judgment [44, 45, 46, 47]; Plaintiffs' Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Haymart's Motion to Vacate 58 . This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached.(Smith, Fran). Modified on 1/28/2013, to reflect copy of order sent to Michael A. Hoelscher, 1214 Friendship Road, Jefferson City, MO 65101, and Theresa Hoelscher, 1214 Friendship Road, Jefferson City, MO 65101, via regular mail this date.(Smith, Fran).
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login