Case Activity (37)

1. Order | Filed: October 14, 2026 | Entered: October 14, 2026 Shymansky v. City of New York et al

   Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | New York Southern

   Order

   ORDER: Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, she is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. ECF No. 11; Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process... in [IFP] cases.); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on all Defendants, through the U.S. Marshals Service, Plaintiff needs to provide the addresses at which the Defendants may be served. Therefore, the Court directs Plaintiff to file on or before October 28, 2026, a sworn statement that lists each defendant separately and states for that defendant: (1) the legal name of that defendant; (2) the address of that defendant at which that defendant may be served; and (3) a full explanation of the Plaintiffs basis for believing that the defendant may be found at that address. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 10/14/2026) (ca)

2. Order | Filed: September 30, 2026 | Entered: September 30, 2026 Shymansky v. City of New York et al

   Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | New York Southern

   Order Granting IFP Application

   ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 09/30/2026) (ca) Transmission to Office of Pro Se Litigation for processing. Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.

3. 35 additional result(s)