The administrative agency of the federal court system said Tuesday that federal courts will have enough funding to continue operating until Jan. 25 despite the government shutdown, the second time the courts have extended the estimated date when they will have to start cutting staff.
A First Circuit panel ruled Friday that the media should be allowed access to juror names and addresses after a trial concludes, siding with a National Public Radio station in Boston that was denied that information after the conviction of New England Compounding Center pharmacist Glenn Chin.
The Federal Circuit said in an order published on Friday that it would remain open during the partial government shutdown, with all deadlines remaining in place and all oral arguments proceeding as scheduled, as the federal courts brace themselves to run out of available funds within the coming days.
Groups representing retailers and the franchise industry have urged the D.C. Circuit to toss a consumer's appeal of a lower court ruling that dismissed her proposed Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act class action against sports concessionaire Centerplate Inc., arguing that such suits unnecessarily threaten businesses.
The Mississippi Supreme Court has ruled KPMG LLP can't kick to arbitration a county's suit over an $88 million accounting error, the latest event in a larger battle relating to the underfunding of an employee pension plan for a county-owned hospital system.
Williams & Connolly LLP’s Supreme Court and appellate practice group tallied up an impressive series of wins over the last year, including presenting oral arguments in three cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and representing the prevailing parties in several of the most significant appellate victories in the country, earning it a place among Law360’s 2018 Appellate Groups of the Year.
The First Circuit on Thursday focused on the term “benefits” in overturning a jury's bribery convictions of a former Puerto Rican senator and a private security company's ex-president in a case that has gone to the U.S. Supreme Court and reshaped double jeopardy law in the process.
A New Jersey state appeals court on Thursday refused to revive a malpractice action against an attorney over claims he mishandled proceeds from a real estate sale that were meant to pay off a mortgage, rejecting the buyer’s argument that a trial court improperly instructed jurors who ultimately sided with the lawyer.
The California Supreme Court agreed to consider whether Certified Tire and Service Centers Inc. employees were bilked out of enhanced pay under the company’s system of rewarding them only for certain types of work, according to a brief filing Wednesday.
The U.S. Supreme Court should toss an inquiry over whether Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross may be deposed over his role in adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census and over the allowable extent of related discovery, as a New York federal court has nixed the question, coalitions of states and immigration organizations told the high court Thursday.
A trial court overstepped when it nixed an arbitrator's decision upholding the use of a formula that The New York Times Co. said inflated its pension withdrawal liability to calculate how much the company owed, the Times' deliverers' pension fund told the Second Circuit.
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Chancery Court correctly tossed a $1.6 million insurance liability suit brought by environmental cleanup firm US Ecology Inc. against the buyer of its spun-off subsidiary, agreeing the sale contract didn't include repayment obligations for noncovered insurance costs.
The federal government has told the Fifth Circuit that a lower court wrongly declared the Indian Child Welfare Act unconstitutional, saying that the ruling went against longstanding precedent and that several of the law’s provisions could have been severed without striking down the entire law.
PacifiCorp, Utah and an industry group on Wednesday told the D.C. Circuit that environmentalists can't sustain claims that a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency order instituted a nationally applicable change to the way certain Clean Air Act permits are issued without proper public notice and comment.
The Fifth Circuit on Wednesday upheld a $20.5 million verdict in a partnership dispute over profits from a YouTube channel focused on video games, rejecting an argument from two partners in the channel that the lower court never had jurisdiction to hear the case.
A New Jersey appeals court on Thursday said it would not revive a lawsuit seeking to hold a pair of construction-related firms liable for a fatal traffic collision, saying it is clear the companies should not face consequences for the actions of the driver.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and R Street Institute on Wednesday jumped into a U.S. Supreme Court case to defend the government’s use of America Invents Act reviews, arguing the U.S. Postal Service was rightly viewed as a "person" when it challenged a patent at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
New York City, San Francisco and Philadelphia have no legal standing to sue the U.S. Department of Defense to force it to improve its compliance with obligations to report information on convicted service members to a federal database used for gun background checks, the Fourth Circuit has ruled.
Upcoming oral arguments will proceed as planned in the case over net neutrality deregulation, the D.C. Circuit ruled Thursday, denying the Federal Communications Commission’s request to delay the event due to the government shutdown.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday denied the federal government’s bid to delay oral arguments in an appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision upholding the validity of an electronic trading patent, despite arguments that Justice Department attorneys could not attend because of the ongoing government shutdown.
A New Jersey appeals court ruled Thursday that there is no reason to disturb a jury’s verdict that Liberty Insurance Corp. is not liable to a customer who claimed he had ongoing injuries from a crash with an underinsured motorist.
The latest term ended with a bang with Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement, but the cases themselves packed a punch this term. With the Supreme Court back at full strength, the docket was loaded with issues that divided the nine justices. Here, Law360 takes a look at the oddest voting lineups, the juiciest dissents and the best oral argument moments from a contentious session.
With more judicial vacancies at the start of his term than any president in the past three decades, President Donald Trump has an unusual opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary. Here is Law360's comprehensive guide to the nominations.
In a series of exclusive interviews with Law360, current and former Supreme Court justices discussed topics as varied as the president’s wartime powers, their own decision-making process, the confirmation of the court’s newest member, and the void left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
After years of trending upward, the amount of new Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act litigation might slow somewhat in 2019, yet several active cases are scheduled for trial and many decisions are expected to issue, say Joshua Whitehill and Michael Cottler of Goodwin Procter LLP.
Team-based specialization in mass tort litigation defense allows each member to draw on individual strengths, maximizing their contribution. A core tenet of this approach is using settlement counsel to focus on strategic initiatives and end-game resolution efforts, separate from the heated battle lines of the litigation, say attorneys at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
Some have seen the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to hear Emulex v. Gary Varjabedian as an opportunity to deny investors any ability to bring claims under Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act. This effort is misguided for several reasons, say Corban Rhodes and Anna Menkova of Labaton Sucharow LLP.
The conversation surrounding the grand jury subpoena case related to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation focuses on the “mysterious” corporation. Of broader importance, the proceedings probed the mysterious area of criminal immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, says Kristina Arianina of Squire Patton Boggs LLP.
Last year, the circuit split on computer fraud insurance coverage continued, with courts slightly favoring coverage for phishing scams, but oversimplifying those decisions into a simple coverage versus no-coverage distinction would be a mistake, says Patricia Carreiro of Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider LLP.
U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Azar v. Allina Health Services seemed to favor a ruling that could mean billions of dollars in additional Medicare payments to many hospitals. But the case also could significantly affect Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services operations, say Mark Polston and Matthew Horton of King & Spalding LLP.
The lack of minority partners comes at a high cost to firms, say attorneys at Lightfoot Franklin & White LLC, as they suggest several practical ways to tackle this problem.
The Federal Circuit's ruling last week in Amerigen v. UCB provides an informative data point regarding standing for inter partes review appeals in the Hatch-Waxman context, as well as considerations for brand companies facing obviousness challenges to patents claiming prodrug compounds, say attorneys with King & Spalding LLP.
For those navigating the California class action landscape in 2019, it pays to know what happened in 2018. William Stern of Covington & Burling LLP looks back at the most important developments and discusses what to expect going forward.
The U.S. Supreme Court should agree to review the Federal Circuit’s standing jurisprudence in JTEKT v. GKN, and confirm a “dissatisfied” petitioner’s right to challenge an inter partes review decision, as set forth by Congress, say attorneys with Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP.