Appellate

  • November 03, 2025

    Tribes Push Supreme Court To Overturn Okla. Tax Ruling

    The Oklahoma Supreme Court incorrectly ruled that a member of the Muscogee Creek Nation owes Oklahoma income tax, groups representing Native American tribes told the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to hear the case and reverse the ruling.

  • November 03, 2025

    Academics Back IP Rights For Generated Art At High Court

    A group of 14 academics and legal experts is backing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court from a computer scientist seeking a copyright for artwork created by a computer system he developed, telling the justices in an amicus brief that the work-for-hire doctrine should extend to such generated works.

  • November 03, 2025

    NJ Justices Unsure Charity Immunity Applies To Clinic

    New Jersey Supreme Court justices appeared open on Monday to reviving a community health clinic patient's injury suit, questioning whether the organization's archived web pages and general claims of patient education qualified it for protection under the state's Charitable Immunity Act.

  • November 03, 2025

    Amazon Should Pay For Security Checks, Conn. Justices Told

    Amazon must pay Connecticut warehouse workers for time spent waiting for and undergoing security screenings because state wage and hour laws contain unique "hours worked" definitions that do not appear in the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the employees' lawyer told the Connecticut Supreme Court on Monday.

  • November 03, 2025

    Appeals Court Gives Fired HR Directors 2nd Shot At RICO Suit

    A trial court jumped the gun in tossing a lawsuit against a construction company by two ex-human resource directors who claimed they were fired for raising concerns about fraudulent work authorization records, the Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled.

  • November 03, 2025

    Fire Forced Search Of Murder Suspect's Home, NJ Justices Told

    Prosecutors urged the New Jersey Supreme Court on Monday to reverse a lower court's suppression of evidence in the case of a Garden State man accused of killing his brother and his brother's family, arguing that an ongoing fire at the home where the evidence was recovered justified the warrantless seizure.

  • November 03, 2025

    Tribe, Coalition Fight 9th Circ. Bid To Nix Ariz. Land Exchange

    An Apache tribe and conservation groups are fighting a Ninth Circuit bid to dismiss their efforts to block a 2,500-acre land exchange within Tonto National Forest, saying the federal government and mining company's arguments inaccurately center on a sentence in the 2014 Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act.

  • November 03, 2025

    Fla. Pain Doc Was 'Pawn' In Kickback Scheme, 11th Circ. Told

    A Florida pain management doctor on Monday urged the Eleventh Circuit to reverse his conviction in a conspiracy to accept kickbacks for prescribing a liquid fentanyl drug, arguing that he was merely a "pawn" in the scheme.

  • November 03, 2025

    10th Circ. Backs Cop's Stakeout Testimony In Felon Gun Case

    The Tenth Circuit has ruled that law enforcement had probable cause to search and arrest a convicted felon after they saw him in possession of firearms during an unrelated sting operation at a motel where he was staying.

  • November 03, 2025

    DC Circ. Questions Tribe's Bid To Exclude 1929 Descendants

    A panel of D.C. Circuit judges expressed skepticism that a group of California Valley Miwok Tribe members can exclude a wide swath of the organization when drafting a tribal constitution, pressing an attorney for the members on seeming contradictions in their view of the government's role in the process.

  • November 03, 2025

    5th Circ. Asks If New Review Needed For Texas Gas Facility

    A Fifth Circuit panel pressed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to explain whether it can greenlight an extension for construction of a liquefied natural gas facility without again reviewing facility emissions, asking Monday what to do with language in the law seemingly calling for another review.

  • November 03, 2025

    Black Man Granted New Trial In Mass. Over Lawyer's Bias

    A Black man who pled guilty to firearms offenses in 2018 after consulting with his lawyer — who was found to have made racist social media posts — is entitled to a new trial, Massachusetts' intermediate-level appeals court said Monday, unanimously reversing a lower court's decision.

  • November 03, 2025

    DeSantis Appoints Broward Judge To Fla. State Appeals Court

    A judge for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit of Florida has been appointed to the state's Fourth District Court of Appeal.

  • November 03, 2025

    Justices Skeptical Of Tolling Supervised-Release Absconders

    The U.S. Supreme Court appeared hesitant Monday to embrace the government's arguments that the "fugitive tolling" doctrine, which bans criminal defendants from earning credits to reduce prison sentences while they are not behind bars, should also be used to penalize defendants who abscond from supervised release.

  • November 03, 2025

    Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court

    From billion-dollar pharma feuds to shifting equity deadlines, Delaware's courts saw another week of battles over mergers, fiduciary duty and judicial limits.

  • November 03, 2025

    Calif. Panel Won't Nix Walmart Verdict Over Juror's Stocks

    A California appeals panel won't revive a woman's claims against Walmart Inc. over chemical burns she suffered when a bottle of bleach opened while she was taking it off the shelf, saying she hadn't preserved for appeal any of her objections to a juror who she claims was biased because he owned Walmart stock.

  • October 31, 2025

    Ga. Panel Says McClain Standard Applies In Sterigenics Case

    The Georgia Court of Appeals on Friday vacated a trial court's decision in eight toxic tort bellwether suits claiming harmful emissions from a Sterigenics sterilization plant caused cancer and birth defects, saying the trial court used the wrong legal standard regarding expert testimony in toxic tort cases.

  • October 31, 2025

    Wheeling & Appealing: The Latest Must-Know Appellate Action

    In this installment of Wheeling & Appealing, November's appellate calendar features a Trump lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, New York City housing disputes, drug pricing battles, immigrant rights cases, and challenges to so-called patent troll laws.

  • October 31, 2025

    10th Circ. Rules Fed Can Reject Master Account Access

    A divided Tenth Circuit panel ruled Friday that Federal Reserve banks have the discretion to reject master account access requests from eligible entities, rejecting crypto-focused Custodia Bank's claim that it is entitled to a master account in a decision that prompted a dissenting judge to say "the Fed has gone too far."

  • October 31, 2025

    Citadel Securities Moves To Block New IEX Options Exchange

    Citadel Securities LLC is calling on the Eleventh Circuit to act quickly to stop a new options exchange from going live early next year, saying Friday the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission blessed the exchange despite its unique structure threatening to disadvantage all other market participants.

  • October 31, 2025

    9th Circ. Nixes Exemption To Bioengineered Food Label Rule

    The Ninth Circuit delivered a mixed ruling Friday in some food advocacy groups' challenge to federal food labeling regulations, affirming that the U.S. Department of Agriculture can use the term "bioengineered" over "GMO" or "genetically modified" but reversing an order exempting highly refined foods from receiving the bioengineered label.

  • October 31, 2025

    Seattle Wins Injunction Against Trump's Anti-DEI Grant Terms

    A Washington federal judge shielded Seattle on Friday from a pair of Trump administration executive orders requiring federal grant recipients to cease diversity programming and refrain from using any of the money to "promote gender ideology," saying the city's legal challenge will likely succeed.

  • October 31, 2025

    Up Next At High Court: Tariffs, Fugitives & Contractor Liability

    The U.S. Supreme Court will begin its November oral argument session Monday, during which the justices will consider President Donald Trump's authority to impose tariffs on foreign countries under an emergency statute, whether military contractors can be held liable for alleged breaches of contracts in war zones, and if there are time limits for litigants who want to vacate a void judgment. Here, Law360 breaks down the week's oral arguments.

  • October 31, 2025

    5th Circ. Rejects Late Claims Over Arkema Plant Explosions

    The Fifth Circuit on Friday tossed claims that accused chemical manufacturer Arkema Inc. of being liable for property damage caused by one of its industrial plants exploding after Hurricane Harvey hit Texas in 2017, ruling that the lower court rightfully determined that the claims are time-barred.

  • October 31, 2025

    Woman Can't Sue For Being Jeered As 'Karen,' NJ Panel Says

    A New Jersey state appeals court Friday refused to revive a woman's lawsuit accusing an amusement park of wrongfully keeping her off a go-kart ride and failing to prevent kids from calling her derogatory names like "Karen," saying the woman couldn't back her claims with any binding legal authority.

Expert Analysis

  • Series

    Playing The Violin Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Playing violin in a string quartet reminds me that flexibility, ambition, strong listening skills, thoughtful leadership and intentional collaboration are all keys to a successful legal practice, says Julie Park at MoFo.

  • Purdue Case Could Transform Patent Obviousness Analyses

    Author Photo

    If accepted for review by the U.S. Supreme Court, Purdue Pharma v. Accord Healthcare — concerning whether Purdue's abuse-deterrent opioid formulation patents were invalid as obvious — could significantly shift how courts weigh secondary considerations in patent obviousness analyses, say attorneys at Lathrop.

  • NM Cyber Ruling Will Spur Litigation As Coverage Remedy

    Author Photo

    In Kane v. Beazley, the New Mexico Court of Appeals recently found that a cyber liability provision insuring security breaches included coverage for funds transfer fraud, implicitly and incorrectly motivating policyholders to commence litigation to avoid contractual limitations on cyber coverages, say attorneys at Zelle.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Practicing Self-Care

    Author Photo

    Law schools don’t teach the mental, physical and emotional health maintenance tools necessary to deal with the profession's many demands, but practicing self-care is an important key to success that can help to improve focus, manage stress and reduce burnout, says Rachel Leonard​​​​​​​ at MG+M.

  • Texas' Cactus Ruling Clarifies 'Produced Water' Rules

    Author Photo

    The Texas Supreme Court's decision in Cactus Water Services v. COG Operating, holding that mineral interest lessees have the rights to water extracted alongside oil and gas, should benefit industry players by clarifying the rules — but it leaves important questions about royalties unresolved, say attorneys at Yetter Coleman.

  • ABA Opinion Makes It A Bit Easier To Drop A 'Hot Potato'

    Author Photo

    The American Bar Association's recent ethics opinion clarifies when attorneys may terminate clients without good cause, though courts may still disqualify a lawyer who drops a client like a hot potato, so sending a closeout letter is always a best practice, say attorneys at Thompson Hine.

  • How Political Divisions Are Stalling Pa. Energy Development

    Author Photo

    Despite possessing the nation's second-largest natural gas reserves and a legacy of energy infrastructure, Pennsylvania faces a fragmented and politically charged path to developing the energy resources it will need in the future, thanks to legislative gridlock, divided public opinion and competing energy interests, says Andrew Levine at Stradley Ronon.

  • How High Court Ruling Can Aid Judgment Enforcement In US

    Author Photo

    In CC/Devas (Mauritius) v. Antrix, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that only two steps are required to keep a foreign sovereign in federal court, making it a little easier for investors to successfully bring foreign states and sovereign-owned and -controlled entities into U.S. courts, says Kristie Blase at Felicello Law.

  • What High Court's Tenn. Trans Care Ruling Means Nationally

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti, upholding a Tennessee ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors, is fairly limited in scope and closely tailored to the specific language of Tennessee's law, but it may have implications for challenges to similar laws in other states, say attorneys at Hall Render.

  • Justices Rewrite Rules For Challenging Enviro Agency Actions

    Author Photo

    Three recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings — Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, Oklahoma v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining — form a jurisprudential watershed in administrative and environmental law, affirming statutory standing and venue provisions as the backbone of coherent judicial review, say attorneys at GableGotwals.

  • Series

    My Opera And Baseball Careers Make Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Though participating in opera and the world of professional baseball often pulls me away from the office, my avocations improve my legal career by helping me perform under scrutiny, prioritize team success, and maintain joy and perspective at work, says Adam Unger at Herrick Feinstein.

  • High Court ACA Ruling May Harm Preventative Care

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Kennedy v. Braidwood last week, ruling that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services secretary has authority over an Affordable Care Act preventive care task force, risks harming the credibility of the task force and could open the door to politicians dictating clinical recommendations, says Michael Kolber at Manatt.

  • Opinion

    Subject Matter Eligibility Test Should Return To Preemption

    Author Photo

    Subject matter eligibility has posed challenges for patentees due to courts' arbitrary and confusing reasoning, but adopting a two-part preemption test could align the applicant, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the courts, says Manav Das at McDonnell Boehnen.

  • 8 Ways Lawyers Can Protect The Rule Of Law In Their Work

    Author Photo

    Whether they are concerned with judicial independence, regulatory predictability or client confidence, lawyers can take specific meaningful actions on their own when traditional structures are too slow or too compromised to respond, says Angeli Patel at the Berkeley Center of Law and Business.

  • Kousisis Concurrence Maps FCA Defense To Anti-DEI Suits

    Author Photo

    Justice Clarence Thomas' recent concurrence in Kousisis v. U.S. lays out how federal funding recipients could use the high standard for materiality in government fraud cases to fight the U.S. Justice Department’s threatened False Claims Act suits against payees deviating from the administration’s anti-DEI policies, say attorneys at Miller & Chevalier.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.