Appellate

  • December 10, 2025

    Union Pacific Gets $3.5M Verdict Nixed Over Theft Evidence

    An Illinois appeals court has wiped out a $3.5 million injury verdict against Union Pacific Railroad Co., saying the trial court wrongly excluded evidence that the plaintiff had previously been convicted of a felony crime of dishonesty.

  • December 10, 2025

    Del. Supreme Court Backs AMC's $99.3M D&O Coverage Bid

    The Delaware Supreme Court has upheld a Superior Court ruling that AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. can seek directors and officers insurance coverage for its $99.3 million share-based settlement of a 2023 stockholder lawsuit, rejecting Midvale Indemnity Co.'s bid to block recovery tied to the company's preferred-equity conversion and reverse stock split.

  • December 10, 2025

    Del. Justices Probe Charter Defense Rights In VoiP Fight

    A Delaware Supreme Court panel on Wednesday pressed an attorney for Charter Communications Holding on the company's obligation to provide notice that a supplier's patents — and its duty to defend — were entangled in a Sprint Communication infringement suit against Charter and affiliates.

  • December 10, 2025

    Justices Chew Over 'Close' Case On Fund Contract Disputes

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday waffled over whether there was a private right to sue to void contracts that allegedly violate the Investment Company Act, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh saying that a decision on the case involving an activist investor's voting rights would be "extremely close."

  • December 10, 2025

    Wanted: Temporary US Attorney, No Experience Needed

    Frustrated by a string of court rulings disqualifying several of his U.S. attorney picks, President Donald Trump lamented recently that he might "just have to keep appointing people for three months and then just appoint another one, another one." Experts say the idea raises legal and practical issues.

  • December 10, 2025

    11th Circ. Backs UPS' Win In Fired Driver's Retaliation Suit

    The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a jury win for UPS in a Black delivery driver's suit alleging he was fired for complaining that his boss over scrutinized him out of racial bias, ruling the lower court's move to exclude testimony from the driver's colleague didn't affect the trial's outcome.

  • December 10, 2025

    Md. Appeals Court Upholds $1.1M Home Value

    A Maryland circuit court did not err in affirming the state tax court's decision upholding the $1.1 million valuation of a Prince George's County home, the Appellate Court of Maryland ruled.

  • December 09, 2025

    States Ask Justices To Curtail Federal Trucking Law Shield

    Ohio and 28 other states have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to hold that a federal trucking industry law can't shield freight brokers from certain state-based injury claims, arguing Congress did not intend to undermine states' authority over regulating road safety.

  • December 09, 2025

    Wash. Justices To Review Immunity In $2.3M Ambulance Case

    Washington's highest court will review a $2.3 million verdict over a cancer patient's death in an ambulance crash, agreeing to consider what the ambulance operator called a "double standard" in an appeals court ruling that it said would grant immunity to crews transporting patients experiencing mental health crises, but not those in need of physical care.

  • December 09, 2025

    NY Appeals Court Revives $77M Solar Plant Guaranty Fight

    A New York state appeals court on Tuesday revived a lawsuit from solar facility operators seeking to enforce a more than $77 million arbitration award against Italian energy conglomerate Enel SpA, finding Enel's guaranty agreements with the operators are ambiguous.

  • December 09, 2025

    11th Circ. Weighs Immunity In Fla. Excessive Force Case

    Four Miami-area police officers urged the Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday to grant qualified immunity in a lawsuit accusing them of excessive force, arguing their level of physical control was necessary to restrain a teenager displaying extraordinary strength during a mental health breakdown. 

  • December 09, 2025

    USPTO Assignor Estoppel Denials Flout Law, Fed. Circ. Told

    Cloud database company Tessell Inc. has told the Federal Circuit that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is violating the court's clear precedent by refusing to review patents when the challengers include the named inventors.

  • December 09, 2025

    7th Circ. Mulls Pension Plan's Decision To Expel Penske Unit

    A Seventh Circuit judge on Tuesday suggested Penske's push for the judicial review of trustees' internal decision-making was a "long and new stretch" in a dispute over whether a Teamsters pension plan had the power to expel a Penske bargaining unit in Dallas, questioning what law authorizes such scrutiny.

  • December 09, 2025

    FERC's Fate Uncertain As Humphrey's Executor Teeters

    The future of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may hinge on whether the U.S. Supreme Court will remake its 90-year-old precedent that protects members of independent agencies from being fired at will by the president.

  • December 09, 2025

    10th Circ. Greenlights Arbitration In Chase Bank Racism Suit

    The Tenth Circuit on Monday reversed a lower court ruling that blocked JP Morgan Chase & Co. from taking to arbitration a lawsuit brought by a customer who alleges a Colorado branch manager racially discriminated against her. 

  • December 09, 2025

    GOP, Dems Spar At High Court On Party Spending Caps

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday considered the constitutionality of caps on how much money political parties can spend directly on candidates' campaigns, in a case that pitted the nation's major political camps against one another.

  • December 09, 2025

    DC Circ. Questions Lack Of Warning In Expedited Removals

    A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel appeared split Tuesday over whether unauthorized immigrants need notice of their due process rights when facing expedited removal.

  • December 09, 2025

    German Software Co. Settles Suit Over Ex-HP-Owned Patents

    German software company SAP SE has inked a deal to end a lawsuit in Texas federal court accusing it of infringing various patents owned by Valtrus Innovations Ltd. covering computer data and communication.

  • December 09, 2025

    Senate Confirms 3 Judges For La., Miss.

    The U.S. Senate confirmed three judicial nominees Tuesday for federal courts in Louisiana and Mississippi.

  • December 09, 2025

    CoStar Urges Justices To Review Revived Antitrust Claims

    CoStar is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit ruling reviving antitrust counterclaims from a rival commercial real estate platform, saying the appeals court accepted a novel theory of what constitutes exclusive dealing.

  • December 09, 2025

    Fed. Circ. OKs PTAB's Axing Of Some IBM Patent Claims

    The Federal Circuit on Tuesday affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision that invalidated some claims while preserving others in an IBM patent covering a single sign-on technology, rejecting the company's arguments that the board relied on arguments not made by the patent challenger.

  • December 09, 2025

    10th Circ. Orders New Trial For Man Who Killed Neighbor

    An Oklahoma man who shot his neighbor 10 times while on a high dose of Adderall had his murder conviction reversed Tuesday when the Tenth Circuit found the instructions given to the jury deficient with regard to involuntary intoxication and manslaughter, which may have unfairly impacted the verdict.

  • December 09, 2025

    Pa. Justices Affirm County's Loss Over Election Inspections

    Pennsylvania's Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a ruling that the state's top election official could order voting machines to be yanked from service, closing one chapter on the tome of litigation that followed Fulton County's third-party inspection of its Dominion Voting Systems machines after the 2020 election.

  • December 09, 2025

    Cannabis Stores Can't Sue Under RICO, 9th Circ. Rules

    The Ninth Circuit on Tuesday backed a federal judge in tossing racketeering claims brought against a California city by a group of companies facing more than $5 million in local government fees under a contract to allow construction of six cannabis cultivation facilities.

  • December 09, 2025

    Texas Court Blocks Discovery Order In Family Dollar Shooting

    A Texas appeals court on Tuesday blocked parts of a discovery order in a suit over a fatal shooting by a Family Dollar employee, saying the order was overbroad and the trial court abused its discretion in issuing it.

Expert Analysis

  • 7 Document Review Concepts New Attorneys Need To Know

    Author Photo

    For new associates joining firms this fall, stepping into the world of e-discovery can feel like learning a new language, but understanding a handful of fundamentals — from coding layouts to metadata — can help attorneys become fluent in document review, says Ann Motl at Bowman and Brooke.

  • FTC Actions Highlight New Noncompete Enforcement Strategy

    Author Photo

    Several recent noncompete-related actions from the Federal Trade Commission — including its recent dismissal of cases appealing the vacatur of a Biden-era noncompete ban — reflect the commission's shift toward case-by-case enforcement, while confirming that the agency intends to remain active in policing such agreements, say attorneys at Debevoise.

  • NY Laundering Ruling Leans On Jurisdictional Fundamentals

    Author Photo

    A New York appeals court’s recent dismissal of Zhakiyanov v. Ogai, a civil money laundering dispute between Kazakh citizens involving New York real estate, points toward limitations on the jurisdictional reach of state courts and suggests that similar claims will be subject to a searching forum analysis, say attorneys at Curtis Mallet-Prevost.

  • Ruling On Labor Peace Law Marks Shift For Cannabis Cos.

    Author Photo

    Currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit, an Oregon federal court’s novel decision in Casala v. Kotek, invalidating a state law that requires labor peace agreements as a condition of cannabis business licensure, marks the potential for compliance uncertainty for all cannabis employers in states with labor peace mandates, say attorneys at Sheppard Mullin.

  • Fed. Circ. Rulings Refine Patent Claim Construction Standards

    Author Photo

    Four Federal Circuit patent decisions this year clarify several crucial principles governing patent claim construction, including the importance of prosecution history, and the need for error-free, precise language from claims drafters, say attorneys at Taft.

  • Opinion

    Congress Must Resolve PSLRA Issue For Section 11 Litigants

    Author Photo

    By establishing a uniform judgment reduction credit for all defendants in cases involving Section 11 of the Securities Act, Congress could remove unnecessary statutory ambiguity from the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and enable litigants to price potential settlements with greater certainty, say attorneys at Sidley.

  • Agentic AI Puts A New Twist On Attorney Ethics Obligations

    Author Photo

    As lawyers increasingly use autonomous artificial intelligence agents, disciplinary authorities must decide whether attorney responsibility for an AI-caused legal ethics violation is personal or supervisory, and firms must enact strong policies regarding agentic AI use and supervision, says Grace Wynn at HWG.

  • Series

    Being A Professional Wrestler Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Pursuing my childhood dream of being a professional wrestler has taught me important legal career lessons about communication, adaptability, oral advocacy and professionalism, says Christopher Freiberg at Midwest Disability.

  • Patent Claim Lessons From Fed. Circ.'s Teva Decision

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Janssen v. Teva is an important precedent for parties drafting patent claims or litigating obviousness where the prior art has potentially overlapping ranges for a claimed element, and may be particularly instructive to patent applicants in the pharmaceutical field, say attorneys at Cooley.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Adapting To The Age Of AI

    Author Photo

    Though law school may not have specifically taught us how to use generative artificial intelligence to help with our daily legal tasks, it did provide us the mental building blocks necessary for adapting to this new technology — and the judgment to discern what shouldn’t be automated, says Pamela Dorian at Cozen O'Connor.

  • Ch. 11 Ruling Voiding $2M Litigation Funding Sends A Warning

    Author Photo

    A recent Texas bankruptcy court decision that a postconfirmation litigation trust has no obligations to repay a completely drawn down $2 million litigation funding agreement serves as a warning for estate administrators and funders to properly disclose the intended financing, say attorneys at Kleinberg Kaplan.

  • A Changing Playbook For Fighting Records Requests In Del.

    Author Photo

    The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Wong v. Amazon, reversing the denial of an inspection demand brought by a stockholder, serves as a stark warning to corporations challenging books and records requests, making clear that companies cannot defeat such demands solely by attacking the scope of their stated purpose, say attorneys at Duane Morris.

  • Demystifying The Civil Procedure Rules Amendment Process

    Author Photo

    Every year, an advisory committee receives dozens of proposals to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most of which are never adopted — but a few pointers can help maximize the likelihood that an amendment will be adopted, says Josh Gardner at DLA Piper.

  • How The 5th, DC Circuits Agreed On FCC Forfeiture Orders

    Author Photo

    The Fifth and D.C. Circuits split this year on the Federal Communications Commission's process for adjudicating enforcement actions, but both implicitly recognized the problem with penalizing a party based on a forfeiture order that has not yet been challenged in any way in court, says Jared Marx at HWG.

  • With Obligor Ruling, Ohio Justices Calm Lending Waters

    Author Photo

    A recent decision by the Ohio Supreme Court, affirming a fundamental principle that lenders have no duty to disclose material risks to obligors, provides clarity for commercial lending practices in Ohio and beyond, and offers a reminder of the risks presented by guarantee arrangements, says Carrie Brosius at Vorys.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.