Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Appellate
-
November 06, 2025
Wash. Justices Spurn Alaska Airlines' Worker Illness Stance
The Washington Supreme Court on Thursday sided with an Alaska Airlines employee who caught COVID-19 while traveling on the job, rejecting the employer's attempt to distinguish an occupational disease covered by state workers' compensation law from any sickness that develops during a work trip.
-
November 06, 2025
9th Circ. Backs NLRB Ruling On Nurses' Pandemic Pay Fight
The Ninth Circuit has affirmed the National Labor Relations Board's order finding a trio of Southern California hospitals violated federal labor law by unilaterally implementing a COVID-19 pandemic pay program without first bargaining with a Service Employees International Union affiliate representing registered nurses and professional workers.
-
November 06, 2025
NC Panel Vacates Protester's Conviction Over Vulgar Banner
A man who wore a T-shirt that said "Eat Pussy and Protest" while unfurling a sexist banner calling a female North Carolina county commissioner "unprofessional" and a "cunt" had his free speech rights violated when he was arrested at a public meeting, a state appeals court has ruled, reversing his convictions.
-
November 06, 2025
6th Circ. Becomes Latest To Reject NLRB's Thryv Remedy
The Sixth Circuit is the latest court to weigh in on the National Labor Relations Board's 2022 decision that employers must cover any financial hits that workers take due to company misconduct, joining the Third and Fifth circuits and opposing the Ninth Circuit in ruling that the board overstepped.
-
November 06, 2025
Goldstein Loses Bid To Trim Tax Charges Before Trial
A Maryland federal judge Thursday handed SCOTUSblog co-founder Tom Goldstein a series of losses on pre-trial motions aimed at trimming the 22 federal tax charges he'll face at trial next year, ruling that many of the motions involved factual disputes fit for trial and keeping the government's case intact.
-
November 06, 2025
Verizon Gets Backup In Fight Against Stewart Terminating IPR
Patent quality advocacy group Askeladden LLC has backed Verizon's appeal of former acting U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director Coke Morgan Stewart's decision to wipe out a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in the telecom company's favor invalidating an Omega Patents patent.
-
November 06, 2025
Pa. Statehouse Catchup: Cannabis Quality, 'Deepfake' Fines
Even as the Pennsylvania General Assembly has struggled to agree to a state budget since the summer deadline passed, legislators have introduced and advanced bills dealing with perennial topics like cannabis legalization or responding to newer concerns like AI-fueled fraud.
-
November 06, 2025
6th Circ. Won't Rethink FirstEnergy Bribe Probe Docs Ruling
The Sixth Circuit said Thursday it would not reconsider a ruling blocking FirstEnergy investors from accessing documents prepared by BigLaw firms investigating the company's $1 billion bribery scandal, and clarified that the decision also applies to depositions taken in the proposed class action.
-
November 06, 2025
Crocs Urges Fed. Circ. To Reverse ITC Clog Import Ruling
Clogs maker Crocs urged the Federal Circuit on Thursday to reverse a decision from the U.S. International Trade Commission not to impose a ban on imports that the Colorado-based company says are confusingly similar to its own footwear, arguing that the ITC erred in how it considered Crocs' fame and its competitors' intent to confuse consumers.
-
November 06, 2025
Sutter Health Patients' Attys To Get Over $100M Fees, Costs
A California U.S. magistrate judge said Thursday that she is ready to grant final approval of a $228.5 million deal settling a 13-year case over claims that Sutter Health boosted costs by pushing all-or-nothing networks on insurers, which includes $75.4 million in attorney fees and over $28 million in litigation expenses.
-
November 06, 2025
3rd Circ. Won't Revive Investors' Suit Over Viatris Sale
The Third Circuit on Thursday upheld the dismissal of a proposed shareholder class action against pharmaceutical company Viatris, saying that investors hadn't plausibly alleged that they were misled about the future of the company's sold-off biosimilars business.
-
November 06, 2025
NJ Panel Says Med Mal Death Suit Wrongly Tossed
A New Jersey state appeals court on Thursday reinstated a woman's wrongful death suit against a Wayne hospital, finding the trial court misapplied precedent when it found her affidavit of merit was insufficient for not naming the specific employees she claims were negligent.
-
November 06, 2025
Ex-Deputy Sheriff Fights To Keep Political Firing Suit Alive
A former Metro Atlanta deputy sheriff alleging he was forced to resign due to his age and support for the sheriff's 2024 election opponent pushed back Wednesday against a bid to dismiss his lawsuit, arguing his claims against the sheriff as an individual are not barred by qualified immunity.
-
November 06, 2025
SD Tribe Says Time Is Right To Fight Dakota Access Pipeline
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is asking the D.C. Circuit to reverse a lower court's order dismissing its challenge that looked to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline, telling the court it is presenting a live, justiciable controversy regarding the federal government's failure to fulfill mandatory statutory obligations.
-
November 06, 2025
3rd Circ. Rules Carjacker's Autism Didn't Affect Rights Waiver
The Third Circuit Thursday ruled that a convicted carjacker's autism and learning disabilities did not affect his waiver of Miranda rights when talking to police, despite police falsely telling him that an alleged coconspirator confessed and implicated him in the crime.
-
November 06, 2025
Florida AG Tells 11th Circ. Contempt Order Was 'Dangerous'
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier told the Eleventh Circuit that a lower court order holding him in civil contempt for defying an injunction blocking a state immigration law was "dangerous," saying it erodes the U.S. Constitution's separation-of-powers doctrine and diminishes his authority over law enforcement.
-
November 06, 2025
Lawmakers Rip Judges Over Anonymous High Court Criticism
Two Republican lawmakers have asked Chief Justice John Roberts to rein in judges who've anonymously criticized the U.S. Supreme Court's flurry of "shadow docket" rulings, but a full-on investigation appears unlikely.
-
November 06, 2025
NC Panel Says Juror's Date Request Didn't Prejudice Case
An incident in which a juror asked a witness out on a date mere minutes after she left the stand didn't prejudice a woman who was later granted a new trial, a split North Carolina state appeals panel said as it vacated a lower court's decision.
-
November 06, 2025
Larry Klayman Gets 2-Year License Suspension In Florida
The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday suspended conservative activist attorney Larry Klayman's law license for two years in a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding that arose from claims of ethical violations in the District of Columbia.
-
November 06, 2025
Google-Epic Judge Raises Doubts About App Antitrust Deal
The California federal judge overseeing Epic Games' antitrust suit against Google expressed serious doubts Thursday about their recent deal to end their fight over Android app distribution, ordering an evidentiary hearing and warning he's not sure the proposed deal will correct Google's illegal conduct.
-
November 06, 2025
Justices Say Trump Admin Can Implement Trans Passport Ban
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the U.S. Department of State can stop issuing passports to transgender and nonbinary individuals that reflect their gender identity, lifting a nationwide order that required the Trump administration to continue the longtime policy pending litigation.
-
November 06, 2025
Seafood Co. Workers Urge 11th Circ. To Rehear ESOP Fight
Workers for a seafood company urged the Eleventh Circuit to rethink a panel's decision in October that upheld dismissal of their suit accusing the company of employee stock ownership plan mismanagement, arguing the full court should overturn appellate precedent that led to the three-judge panel's decision.
-
November 06, 2025
Nuclear Waste Storage Site Opponents Appeal To High Court
Opponents of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approval of a temporary nuclear waste storage site in New Mexico have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit's decision to toss their challenge.
-
November 06, 2025
Towing Co. Appeals Motorcyclist's $45M Crash Verdict
A Connecticut towing company has challenged a judge's decision to leave intact a $45 million award to a Marine Corps reservist who was paralyzed in a motorcycle crash, elevating the case to the state's intermediate-level appeals court.
-
November 06, 2025
Pa. High Court Revives Death Row Inmate's Jury Bias Claim
A man on death row for stabbing a woman and decapitating a child in front of police may argue he was denied a fair trial, after allegedly discovering that a juror in his case hid an attempted infanticide in his family, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in a reversal.
Expert Analysis
-
Litigation Inspiration: How To Respond After A Loss
Every litigator loses a case now and then, and the sting of that loss can become a medicine that strengthens or a poison that corrodes, depending on how the attorney responds, says Bennett Rawicki at Hilgers Graben.
-
Justices' Resentencing Ruling Fortifies First Step Act Tools
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Hewitt v. U.S. ruling clarifies that resentencing after vacatur must reflect the law in effect at the time of the new sentencing, ultimately strengthening the strategic tools available to defense attorneys under the First Step Act, says Benson Varghese at Varghese Summersett.
-
The Metamorphosis Of The Major Questions Doctrine
The so-called major questions doctrine arose as a counterweight to Chevron deference over the past few decades, but invocations of the doctrine have persisted in the year since Chevron was overturned, suggesting it still has a role to play in reining in agency overreach, say attorneys at Crowell & Moring.
-
Protecting Workers Amid High Court-EEOC Trans Rights Rift
In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services and U.S. v. Skrmetti, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified that Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, so employers should still protect against such discrimination despite the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's unclear position, says Ally Coll at the Purple Method.
-
What 9th Circ. Ruling Shows About Rebutting SEC Comments
The Ninth Circuit's June opinion in Pino v. Cardone Capital suggests that a company's lack of pushback to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission comment may be evidence of its state of mind for evaluating potential liability, meaning companies should consider including additional disclosure in SEC response letters, say attorneys at Barnes & Thornburg.
-
9th Circ. Decisions Help Clarify Scope Of Legal Lab Marketing
Two Ninth Circuit decisions last week provide a welcome development in clarifying the line between laboratories' legal marketing efforts and undue influence that violates the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act, and offer useful guidance for labs seeking to mitigate enforcement risk, says Joshua Robbins at Buchalter.
-
A Word On Ensuring Precision In Patent Claim Construction
The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Express Mobile v. Meta Platforms, overruling the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's interpretation of the term "style," highlights the importance of articulating claim constructions that are as clear as possible, says Derrick Carman at Robins Kaplan.
-
What 9th Circ. Cracker Barrel Ruling Means For FLSA Cert.
The Ninth Circuit's decision in Harrington v. Cracker Barrel suggests a settling of two procedural trends in Fair Labor Standards Act jurisprudence — when to issue notice and where nationwide collectives can be filed — rather than deepening circuit splits, says Rebecca Ojserkis at Cohen Milstein.
-
Series
Playing Mah-Jongg Makes Me A Better Mediator
Mah-jongg rewards patience, pattern recognition, adaptability and keen observation, all skills that are invaluable to my role as a mediator, and to all mediating parties, says Marina Corodemus.
-
How Latest High Court Rulings Refine Employment Law
The 2024-2025 U.S. Supreme Court term did not radically rewrite employment law, but sharpened focus on textual fidelity, procedural rigor and the boundaries of statutory relief, say attorneys at Krevolin & Horst.
-
Calif. Air Waivers Fight Fuels Automakers', States' Uncertainty
The unprecedented attempt by Congress and the Trump administration to kill the Clean Air Act waivers supporting California's vehicle emissions standards will eventually end up in the U.S. Supreme Court — but meanwhile, vehicle manufacturers, and states following California's standards, are left in limbo, says John Watson at Spencer Fane.
-
Diversity, Equity, Indictment? Contractor Risks After Kousisis
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Kousisis v. U.S. decision, holding that economic loss is not required to sustain wire fraud charges related to fraudulent inducement, may extend criminal liability to government contractors that make false diversity, equity and inclusion certifications, say attorneys at Moore & Van Allen.
-
Series
Law School's Missed Lessons: Navigating Client Trauma
Law schools don't train students to handle repeated exposure to clients' traumatic experiences, but for litigators practicing in areas like civil rights and personal injury, success depends on the ability to view cases clinically and to recognize when you may need to seek help, says Katie Bennett at Robins Kaplan.
-
9th Circ. Customs Ruling A Limited Win For FCA Plaintiffs
While the decision last month in Island Industries v. Sigma may be welcome news for False Claims Act relators, under binding precedent courts within the Ninth Circuit still do not have jurisdiction to adjudicate customs-based FCA claims pursued by the government, say attorneys at Morgan Lewis.
-
Opinion
4 Former Justices Would Likely Frown On Litigation Funding
As courts increasingly confront cases involving hidden litigation finance contracts, the jurisprudence of four former U.S. Supreme Court justices establishes a constitutional framework that risks erosion by undisclosed financial interests, says Roland Eisenhuth at the American Property Casualty Insurance Association.