Researchers' Challenge To Anti-Hacking Law Kept Alive

By Ben Kochman (April 2, 2018, 8:26 PM EDT) -- A D.C. federal judge has kept alive a claim by a group of university professors and journalists that a federal anti-hacking law unconstitutionally bars their research into whether hiring websites that use online algorithms discriminate against job applicants.

The researchers have a valid case that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which could bar their studies for breaching the hiring sites' terms of service, violates free speech protections, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates wrote late Friday. The research includes creating accounts for nonexistent users to test whether hiring websites' ranking algorithms — which harness "big data" analytics that can track...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Companies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!