Justices May Struggle To Agree On Rule 10b-5 Scope

By Arthur Greenspan and Jacob Taber ( November 28, 2018, 4:09 PM EST) -- As every securities lawyer knows, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5[1] makes it unlawful to, among other things, "make" a materially false statement in connection with a securities transaction. Next week, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in Lorenzo v. SEC, a case that presents the question of whether a person who knowingly disseminates to investors a false statement "made" by someone else can still be found primarily liable under Rule 10b-5. Lorenzo thus addresses an issue left open in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. First Derivative Traders,[2] where the court, in a 5-4 decision, narrowly defined the "maker" of a statement for purposes of Rule 10b-5(b) as "the person or entity with ultimate authority over the statement, including its content and whether and how to communicate it."[3] Janus held that a fund adviser that allegedly drafted materially misleading statements in a prospectus issued by the fund could not be held primarily liable under 10b-5(b) because the fund, not the adviser, was the maker of the statements....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!