Analysis

What To Expect As Justices Weigh Fate Of Auer Deference

Law360, Washington (March 26, 2019, 10:16 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday will debate whether to overturn Auer deference, a pro-agency judicial doctrine that has come under increasing attacks in recent years. Here's what to expect from the hearing.

The case, Kisor v. Wilkie, was brought by a Vietnam veteran seeking retroactive disability benefits for his post-traumatic stress disorder. At issue is whether the court should get rid of its long-standing rule that judges should accept an agency's interpretation of its own regulations unless it is clearly wrong.

The rule comes from the Supreme Court's 1997 holding in Auer v. Robbins, and an analogous one from 1945...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!