Analysis

Supervised Release Ruling Raises Issues Of Judges' Powers

Law360 (June 26, 2019, 9:23 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that a five-year sentence for a man who violated the terms of his supervised release was unconstitutional, and raised larger issues of when findings by judges, rather than juries, can form the basis for a sentence.

In a deeply split opinion, four justices plus one concurring justice ruled that Andre Ralph Haymond's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights had been violated when a judge was required to sentence him to five years after the judge found that he possessed child pornography while on supervised release. Haymond's initial conviction had been for possessing child porn, and...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

Date Filed

June 15, 2018

Law Firms

Government Agencies