Judge Dyk Says Everyone May Be Looking At Arthrex Wrong

Law360 (February 12, 2021, 7:09 PM EST) -- Federal Circuit Judge Timothy Dyk on Friday suggested the amount of oversight administrative patent judges need depends on the stage of patent reviews, but that either way they have sufficient supervision.

On a panel hosted by the Center for Innovation Policy at Duke Law discussing forthcoming arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Arthrex, Judge Dyk said, "I wonder whether we're maybe not looking at this quite in the right way."

Circuit Judge Timothy Dyk and professors Arti Rai, John Duffy and Melissa Wasserman, on a virtual Duke Law panel. When APJs are deciding to initiate or terminate a patent...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!