Justices Cool To Idea They Must Hear State V. State Suits

By Jimmy Hoover (April 26, 2021, 6:54 PM EDT) -- The idea that the U.S. Supreme Court must hear lawsuits filed by one state against another has caught on with an increasing number of states and scholars, but the court's rejection of a suit from Texas seems to show that so far only Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas subscribe to that view.

Justice Thomas was the only other member of the court to sign onto Justice Alito's dissenting opinion Monday explaining why the court was wrong to deny Texas' motion for leave to file a bill of complaint against California over the latter's so-called travel ban.

"The practice of refusing...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!