Justices Torn On Boston Bomber's Unfair-Trial Claim
By Chris Villani (October 13, 2021, 3:27 PM EDT) -- A seemingly divided U.S. Supreme Court considered Wednesday whether jurors in the Boston Marathon bombing case should have been pressed about what they knew of the attack, with the court's liberal wing suggesting the perpetrator's death sentence may be tainted by pretrial publicity.
The Supreme Court's liberal justices asked why the government has fought against further examining what prospective jurors had seen or heard about the 2013 attack. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) The justices heard the government's appeal seeking to reinstate the death penalty for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev over his role in the bombing, which killed three people — one of them an...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!