A Viable Theory Of Sham Infringement Litigation?

Law360, New York (April 13, 2010, 11:41 AM EDT) -- A sham infringement litigation claim involves an assertion of actual or attempted monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act predicated on the alleged meritless enforcement of a patent. For patent infringement litigation to be a sham, it must be objectively baseless and have been brought with the subjective intent of interfering directly with a competitor’s business relationships by using the judicial process as an anti-competitive weapon.

The initial requirement that the litigation be objectively baseless has proven to be a stumbling block for most sham...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.