We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Opinion-Of-Counsel Defense To Inducement

Law360 (January 29, 2007, 12:00 AM EST) -- On December 13, 2006, in DSU Medical Corp. v. JMS Co., 04-1620, 05-1048, -1052 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2006), the en banc Federal Circuit resolved “conflicting precedent” and unambiguously announced that liability under 35 U.S.C. §271(b) for inducement requires a “specific intent to infringe,” and not merely an intent to induce the acts that are later charged with infringement.

This decision alters conventional wisdom and further increases the value of opinions of counsel.

Despite suggestions in earlier Federal Circuit and district court case law, until now...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.