Law360 (July 22, 2010, 3:35 PM EDT) -- A federal appeals court has overturned a $5.35 million patent infringement jury verdict against Master Lock Co., ruling that the patents asserted by the plaintiff, a Colorado lockmaker, were obvious.
The claims in the three patents-in-suit would have been obvious as a matter of law, a three-judge panel ruled in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday.
The patents-at-issue cover hitch pin locks that secure trailers to cars and sport utility vehicles.
Even if the prior art padlocks were not within the same field of endeavor, they are still clearly "reasonably pertinent" to the problem that the...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!