Deposition Practice In Interferences Clarified

Law360, New York (March 9, 2007, 12:00 AM EST) -- In a recent decision on a motion to exclude evidence, an expanded panel of Administrative Patent Judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences addressed what constitutes proper deposition practice under the Cross Examination Guidelines appended to the Trial Section’s Standing Order of January 3, 2003. Pevarello v. Lan, Pat. Interf. No. 105,394 (P.T.O. Bd. Of Pat. Appeals and Interf., Jan. 12, 2007).

The USPTO Guidelines were based on a 1993 district court decision, in Hall v. Clifton Precision....
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.