Flunking The Untested Hypothesis: Tamraz V. Lincoln

Law360, New York (November 3, 2010, 1:17 PM EDT) -- The admissibility standard for expert testimony continues to mature. In Tamraz, et al. v. Lincoln Elec. Co., et al., ___ F.3d ___, 2010 WL 3489002 (6th Cir. Sept. 8, 2010), the Sixth Circuit vacated a $20.5 million jury verdict and ordered a new trial owing to the erroneous admission of an untested scientific hypothesis concerning causation.

Dealing directly with the admissibility of expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (2010), Tamraz draws a clear distinction between the admissibility of opinions about the diagnosis of a...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.