We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

False Marking Constitutionality Debate To Rage On

Law360 (February 24, 2011, 9:12 PM EST) -- An Ohio district court's finding that the qui tam provision of the false marking statute is unconstitutional may give a boost to companies targeted in suits over allegedly expired patents, but a widespread and lasting impact on the recent rash of case filings is unlikely to occur until the Federal Circuit inevitably weighs in on the issue, attorneys say.

Judge Dan A. Polster of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio ruled Wednesday that the qui tam provision of 34 U.S.C. Section 292,...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.