US Defense Of False Marking Law Falls On Deaf Ears

Law360, New York (March 14, 2011, 8:40 PM EDT) -- A federal judge in Ohio on Monday reaffirmed his February ruling that the qui tam provision of the false patent marking statute is unconstitutional, rejecting the government's argument in defense of the law.

Judge Dan Aaron Polster of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio said he found the government's arguments for the provision's constitutionality unpersuasive, and left in place his earlier order in the case accusing Hy-Grade Valve Inc. of falsely marking its products.

On Feb. 23, Judge Polster ruled that the...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. Hy-Grade Valve, Inc.


Case Number

5:10-cv-01912

Court

Ohio Northern

Nature of Suit

Patent

Judge

Dan Aaron Polster

Date Filed

August 27, 2010

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Patents

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.