Eye Drop Ruling Clarifies Importance Of Patent Phrasing

By Liliana Di Nola-Baron ( July 29, 2025, 6:13 PM EDT) -- In an opinion issued on June 30 by U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi in Eye Therapies LLC v. Slayback Pharma LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's construction of the phrase "consisting essentially of" as having its ordinary meaning of permitting inclusion of components not listed in the claims, if they do not "materially affect the basic and novel properties of the invention."[1]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login