A formerly homeless man's $5,730 bill for his court-appointed lawyer's work will be canceled, ending his appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court.
The state's high court sent the case back to a trial court Friday with instructions to wipe out the attorney fees charged to Donell Ivey, by agreement of the parties.
The justices had been preparing to hear Ivey's appeal of the attorney fees, though no date had been set for oral arguments.
Before Ivey's conviction by jury for assault, he was homeless and supported himself on Social Security disability benefits, according to his petition to the state Supreme Court. Due to his poverty, Ivey was appointed a lawyer to represent him in the assault case.
At his sentencing hearing, Ivey was sentenced to 7 years in prison for the assault and ordered to reimburse the court for the legal assistance he received from his court-appointed counsel.
Ivey argued that the state statute that permits judges to impose the costs of legal assistance on criminal defendants should be read in the context of the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission Act. Under MIDCA, partially indigent defendants pay a portion of the cost of their lawyers' services, while fully indigent defendants are not required to pay for their court-appointed counsel.
Ivey additionally argued his bill was an unconstitutional "fine" that must be distributed to the public libraries, under Michigan's constitution, and cannot be used to reimburse public defenders.
The State Appellate Defender Office, which represented Ivey at the high court, said in November that all people have the right to counsel regardless of financial status and Ivey's case presented "a significant opportunity for the court to clarify how that right is protected and applied in practice."
The Macomb County Prosecutor's Office, which prosecuted the assault case, had agreed that Ivey should not have to pay his lawyer.
Macomb County's public defenders generally no longer make fee requests, the prosecutors said in a court filing, and if legal fees are ordered they can usually be vacated or waived in post-conviction motions.
Ivey "appears to have fallen through the cracks," Macomb County told the state Supreme Court.
Neither party immediately responded to requests for comment.
The state is represented by Emil Semaan of the Macomb County Prosecutor's Office.
Ivey is represented by Kierston Des'Neiges Nunn of the State Appellate Defender Office.
The case is People of Michigan v. Donell Willie-Terrell Ivey, case number 168000, in the Michigan Supreme Court.
--Editing by Kelly Duncan.
Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Law360
|The Practice of Law
Access to Justice
Aerospace & Defense
Appellate
Asset Management
Banking
Bankruptcy
Benefits
California
Cannabis
Capital Markets
Class Action
Colorado
Commercial Contracts
Competition
Compliance
Connecticut
Construction
Consumer Protection
Corporate
Criminal Practice
Cybersecurity & Privacy
Delaware
Employment
Energy
Environmental
Fintech
Florida
Food & Beverage
Georgia
Government Contracts
Health
Hospitality
Illinois
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Trade
Legal Ethics
Legal Industry
Life Sciences
Massachusetts
Media & Entertainment
Mergers & Acquisitions
Michigan
Native American
Law360 Pulse
|Business of Law
Law360 Authority
|Deep News & Analysis
Healthcare Authority
Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & ComplianceGlobal
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®

- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Are you satisfied in your current role?
Click here to take the Law360 survey
This article has been saved to your Briefcase
This article has been added to your Saved Articles
Mich. Justices Undo Atty Fees Imposed On Indigent Defendant
By Carolyn Muyskens | March 6, 2026, 4:44 PM EST · Listen to article