Focusing On Employee Conduct

Law360, New York (June 2, 2011, 10:36 AM EDT) -- On April 20, in Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc., No. A09-949, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that an employee who was discharged for excessive absenteeism and tardiness was discharged for misconduct, and thus could not collect unemployment benefits, even though his employer did not follow its established progressive discipline policy.

The court’s decision clarifies that, when the issue in an unemployment-benefits case is employee misconduct, the focus is on the employee’s conduct, not on the employer’s progressive discipline policy.

Factual Background

Vintage Place had a policy...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.