Princeton Review Brass Sugarcoated Earnings: Investors

Law360, New York (November 15, 2011, 3:59 PM EST) -- Shareholders of The Princeton Review Inc. filed a derivative action Monday alleging the test prep company's current and former officers and directors allowed the company to pump up its earnings, wiping out millions of dollars in market capitalization when the truth emerged.

In a suit filed in Massachusetts federal court, investors claim the Princeton Review's board failed to effectively monitor the conduct of ex-CEO Michael Perik, who told investors in November 2009 that turnaround efforts at the troubled company had worked, all the while overstating its...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Di Nicolo et al v. Perik et al


Case Number

1:11-cv-12008

Court

Massachusetts

Nature of Suit

Stockholders Suits

Judge

Richard G. Stearns

Date Filed

November 14, 2011

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.