We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Strategies After Knorr-Bremse

Law360 (March 7, 2005, 12:00 AM EST) -- In the aftermath of Knorr-Bremse v. Dana Corp., a major patent case decided by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals last September, litigation strategy and business planning for willful patent infringement claims may become somewhat more flexible given a lessened absolute need to obtain and disclose legal opinions.  There is no longer a judicially-imposed “adverse inference” from a failure to obtain or disclose a competent opinion of counsel.  However, many questions left unanswered by Knorr-Bremse -- ranging from how to satisfy the accused infringer’s duty of...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.