Skirting The Constitutional Question In Criminal Fines

Law360, New York (April 17, 2012, 12:44 PM EDT) -- In Southern Union Co. v. United States, No. 11-94, the U.S. Supreme Court once again heard arguments regarding the relationship between the elements of a criminal offense, which must, of course, be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of an impartial jury, and the characteristics of the offender and his offense, which a judge may determine by a preponderance of the evidence, and which are then central to determining the offender’s punishment.

At least since Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.