Getting To A Rule For Reverse Payments

Law360, New York (June 28, 2012, 1:24 PM EDT) -- For a decade now, courts have been grappling with whether so-called "reverse payments" by pioneer pharmaceutical manufacturers to generic competitors in settlement of patent infringement litigation violate the antitrust laws, and with how the competitive effects of reverse-payment settlements should be analyzed. The year 2003 saw a spate of opinions on reverse-payment settlements by circuit courts, the Federal Trade Commission, and noted antitrust scholar Judge Richard Posner (sitting by designation in federal district court).[1] 

These opinions ranged from the Sixth Circuit's per se invalidation of such settlements as payments to competitors in consideration for unlawful agreements not to compete, notwithstanding the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!