Residency Requirement For NJ Candidates Remains Barred

Law360, New York (June 28, 2012, 8:31 PM EDT) -- The New Jersey Supreme Court overstepped its bounds in February by invalidating the election of a state assemblywoman for residency violations despite a federal ruling that the one-year residency requirement for candidacy is unconstitutional and unenforceable, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

In a rebuke to the state's high court, U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise refused New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa's motion to lift the long-standing injunctive order barring enforcement of the residency rule.

“The New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling on the constitutionality...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

ROBERTSON, et al v. BARTELS, et al


Case Number

2:01-cv-02024

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Voting

Judge

Dickinson R. Debevoise

Date Filed

April 27, 2001

Law Firms

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.