Residency Requirement For NJ Candidates Remains Barred

Law360, New York (June 28, 2012, 8:31 PM EDT) -- The New Jersey Supreme Court overstepped its bounds in February by invalidating the election of a state assemblywoman for residency violations despite a federal ruling that the one-year residency requirement for candidacy is unconstitutional and unenforceable, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

In a rebuke to the state's high court, U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise refused New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa's motion to lift the long-standing injunctive order barring enforcement of the residency rule.

“The New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling on the constitutionality...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

ROBERTSON, et al v. BARTELS, et al


Case Number

2:01-cv-02024

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Voting

Judge

Dickinson R. Debevoise

Date Filed

April 27, 2001

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.