Case Study: CLS Bank V. Alice Corp.

Law360, New York (July 25, 2012, 3:15 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly has explained that abstract ideas are not patentable, in part, because to patent an abstract idea would “preempt use of th[e] approach in all fields.”[1] Recent cases have thus called into question whether a claim’s “preemptive force” is a standalone test for patentability under §101 of the U.S. Patent Code. In CLS Bank v. Alice, the Federal Circuit clarified that a claim’s “preemptive force” does not, standing alone, indicate that the claim is abstract. Instead, preemption merely reinforces a conclusion that the claim is nonpatentable.[2]

 

Since the Supreme Court struck down the bright-line machine-or-transformation test...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!