We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close


Q&A With Kaye Scholer's Saul P. Morgenstern

Law360 (October 8, 2007, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Multi-jurisdictional indirect purchaser litigation needs to be revisited because it does not make sense to have a system in which participants at different levels of commerce who claim to have been injured by the same conduct should be litigating those claims in different courts, says Kaye Scholer's Saul P. Morgenstern in our series of chats with high-profile antitrust lawyers.

Q. What attracted you to antitrust as a practice area? And what keeps you interested?

A. A fortunate accident, in the first instance, connected me with a...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.