Law360, New York (October 8, 2007, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Multi-jurisdictional indirect purchaser litigation needs to be revisited because it does not make sense to have a system in which participants at different levels of commerce who claim to have been injured by the same conduct should be litigating those claims in different courts, says Kaye Scholer's Saul P. Morgenstern in our series of chats with high-profile antitrust lawyers.
Q. What attracted you to antitrust as a practice area? And what keeps you interested?
A. A fortunate accident, in the first instance, connected me with a...
Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.