NJ Atty Accused Of Bad Billing Can't Revive Defamation Suit

Law360, New York (January 2, 2013, 4:11 PM EST) -- A New Jersey appellate court has ruled against an attorney who accused a client's business associate of defamation over fraudulent billing allegations, agreeing that the purported statements were protected by the "common interest" privilege.

The court rejected the arguments of Sarmasti PLLC principal Vafa Sarmasti that the privilege — under which private parties can make potentially defamatory statements to a limited audience with common concerns — didn't apply or that defendant Joshua Emanuel abused it by maliciously claiming that Sarmasti billed Dr. Khash Vosough's business interests...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.