High Court Won't Weigh In On "Excessive" Damages

Law360, New York (November 26, 2007, 12:00 AM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal over an allegedly excessive damage award in a contract case between two oil and gas measurement companies, despite amicus curiae briefs from several legal groups that argued the due process clause requires meaningful judicial review of all jury verdicts.

The Product Liability Advisory Council, National Association of Manufacturers and Washington Legal Foundation were all granted leave to file briefs as amicus curiae in Daniel Measurement Services Inc. v. Eagle Research Inc.

The three groups had...
To view the full article, register now.

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.