Generic Medical Foods Not Identical To Pamlab's, Suits Say

Law360, New York (January 29, 2013, 2:49 PM EST) -- Pamlab LLC on Monday filed false advertising complaints in Washington state and Louisiana accusing Viva Pharmaceutical Inc. and Macoven Pharmaceuticals LLC of selling generic versions of medical foods without ensuring the specialty vitamin treatments are identical to brand-name counterparts.

The federal lawsuits, which were joined by Pamlab’s authorized generics maker, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc., allege that Canada-based Viva and Texas-based Macoven promoted their products as substitutes for branded medical foods despite lacking proof the active ingredients were the same.

In addition, both companies affixed expiration dates to...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Pamlab LLC et al v. Macoven Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C.


Case Number

2:13-cv-00152

Court

Louisiana Eastern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Kurt D. Engelhardt

Date Filed

January 28, 2013


Case Title

Nestle Health Science-Pamlab Lnc. et al v. Viva Pharmaceutical, Inc.


Case Number

2:13-cv-00158

Court

Washington Western

Nature of Suit

Trademark

Judge

James L. Robart

Date Filed

January 27, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.