Greenberg Traurig Says Stanford Deal Imperils Law Firms

Law360, New York (March 26, 2013, 4:32 PM EDT) -- Greenberg Traurig LLP told a Texas federal court Monday that it opposed a settlement between the U.S. and Antiguan receivers in charge of compensating victims of Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme because the deal could spark a second wave of litigation against law firms.

The settlement, which includes unobjectionable provisions to resolve disputes about jurisdiction over $300 million that Stanford had in the U.K., Switzerland and Canada, also had provisions that would allow more lawsuits to be filed against law firms like Greenberg Traurig...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank Ltd et al


Case Number

3:09-cv-00298

Court

Texas Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange

Judge

David C Godbey

Date Filed

February 17, 2009

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.