Merck Atty's Letter Ruled Harmless In Whistleblower's Suit

Law360, Philadelphia (March 27, 2013, 3:44 PM EDT) -- A Pennsylvania federal judge Friday tossed defamation claims levied at Merck & Co. Inc. and an in-house lawyer by a former employee of a Merck contractor, finding that a statement by the attorney had caused no harm.

U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle concluded that Merck attorney Thomas Fitzgibbon’s rejection of a whistleblowing effort that worker Leo Gibney had launched against the contractor ultimately had no impact on Gibney’s reputation.

“Even if Fitzgibbon’s statement that the actions of Gibney were unfounded is a [potentially false] statement of...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

GIBNEY v. FITZGIBBON et al


Case Number

2:13-cv-00007

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander

Judge

HARVEY BARTLE, III

Date Filed

January 2, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.