Merck Atty's Letter Ruled Harmless In Whistleblower's Suit

Law360, Philadelphia (March 27, 2013, 3:44 PM EDT) -- A Pennsylvania federal judge Friday tossed defamation claims levied at Merck & Co. Inc. and an in-house lawyer by a former employee of a Merck contractor, finding that a statement by the attorney had caused no harm.

U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle concluded that Merck attorney Thomas Fitzgibbon’s rejection of a whistleblowing effort that worker Leo Gibney had launched against the contractor ultimately had no impact on Gibney’s reputation.

“Even if Fitzgibbon’s statement that the actions of Gibney were unfounded is a [potentially false] statement of...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

GIBNEY v. FITZGIBBON et al


Case Number

2:13-cv-00007

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander

Judge

HARVEY BARTLE, III

Date Filed

January 2, 2013

Law Firms

Companies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.