A Narrow Exception To The Mensing Preemption Defense
April 4, 2013, 12:57 PM EDT
Law360, New York (April 4, 2013, 12:57 PM EDT) -- The Sixth Circuit recently held that a failure-to-warn claim could proceed against a generic manufacturer that had failed to timely follow the brand-name label. Fulgenzi v. Pliva Inc., Case No. 12-3504 (6th Cir. March 13, 2013). In doing so, the court created a narrow exception to the preemption defense established by Pliva Inc. v. Mensing, 131 S. Ct. 2567 (2011).
Liability for Generic Manufacturers After Mensing
In Mensing¸ the U.S. Supreme Court held that failure-to-warn claims against generic drug manufacturers were preempted because it was impossible...
Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.