Insurer Says Holmes Weddle Isn't Owed Malpractice Coverage

Law360, New York (May 29, 2013, 1:55 PM EDT) -- Federal Insurance Co. sued Holmes Weddle & Barcott PC in Washington federal court Tuesday, seeking a ruling that it doesn't have to cover the law firm in a malpractice case stemming from a $1.7 million judgment in an underlying employee injury suit.

FIC says because the actions leading to the malpractice action happened before HWB's professional liability policy went into effect in 2012 — and because the firm failed to fully disclose a sanctions order eventually leading to the suit — it shouldn't have to defend...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Federal Insurance Company v. Holmes Weddle & Barcott, P.C. et al


Case Number

2:13-cv-00926

Court

Washington Western

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Judge

James L. Robart

Date Filed

May 28, 2013

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.