High Court Precedents Safe Despite Alito's Dire Warning

Law360, New York (June 17, 2013, 9:07 PM EDT) -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito sharply criticized his fellow justices Monday for striking down a 2002 precedent limiting the role of juries in sentencing, but legal experts disputed his claim that the ruling would put other landmark decisions in jeopardy.

In a 5-4 ruling in Alleyne v. U.S., the court found that any fact in a case that increases a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence must be submitted to a jury. The decision overturned a 2002 ruling in Harris v. U.S. that had allowed judges to...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.