High Court Precedents Safe Despite Alito's Dire Warning

Law360, New York (June 17, 2013, 9:07 PM EDT) -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito sharply criticized his fellow justices Monday for striking down a 2002 precedent limiting the role of juries in sentencing, but legal experts disputed his claim that the ruling would put other landmark decisions in jeopardy.

In a 5-4 ruling in Alleyne v. U.S., the court found that any fact in a case that increases a defendant’s mandatory minimum sentence must be submitted to a jury. The decision overturned a 2002 ruling in Harris v. U.S. that had allowed judges to...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.