Attys Weigh In On Justices' Ruling In Harassment Suit

Law360, New York (June 24, 2013, 10:35 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that only employees with the authority to hire, fire or promote others should count as supervisors in Title VII harassment suits. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the 5-4 ruling is significant.

Chris Bacon, Vinson & Elkins LLP

"The biggest loser in Vance [v. Ball State University] is the [U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission], which had long been a proponent of a broad and vague definition of supervisor, including anyone who exercised direction over another's daily work — even those without real power on major employment decisions. While employees can still assert claims of harassment based...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!