Md. High Court Upholds Rarely Seen Negligence Doctrine

Law360, New York (July 9, 2013, 6:36 PM EDT) -- Maryland's highest court affirmed Tuesday that a defendant does not have to pay damages if a plaintiff's negligence is even slightly to blame for an alleged injury, a doctrine that most states have abandoned and a dissenting judge deemed a “dinosaur.”

A majority of the Maryland Court of Appeals backed state courts' use of the 165-year-old doctrine of contributory negligence. All but four states adhere to a version of the comparative negligence doctrine, which holds that a defendant is liable for damages in proportion to its...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.