Split On 'Supervisor' Resolved — But What Now?

Law360, New York (July 11, 2013, 4:24 PM EDT) -- As employment law practitioners and human resources professionals are no doubt aware, recently, the United States Supreme Court in Vance v. Ball State University resolved a circuit split regarding the proper test for determining whether an employee is a “supervisor” for purposes of analyzing harassment claims under Title VII.

In short, the court adopted a narrow definition of “supervisor,” holding that “an employee is a ‘supervisor’ for purposes of vicarious liability under Title VII if he or she is empowered by the employer to take tangible...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.