Split On 'Supervisor' Resolved — But What Now?

Law360, New York (July 11, 2013, 4:24 PM EDT) -- As employment law practitioners and human resources professionals are no doubt aware, recently, the United States Supreme Court in Vance v. Ball State University resolved a circuit split regarding the proper test for determining whether an employee is a “supervisor” for purposes of analyzing harassment claims under Title VII.

In short, the court adopted a narrow definition of “supervisor,” holding that “an employee is a ‘supervisor’ for purposes of vicarious liability under Title VII if he or she is empowered by the employer to take tangible...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.