USPTO Re-Exam Considerations After Fresenius V. Baxter

Law360, New York (August 9, 2013, 11:47 AM EDT) -- In some cases, a final decision in re-examination canceling a patent can trump an affirmed jury decision of infringement and validity of the same patent after entry of judgment on the verdict. This was the situation in the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Fresenius USA Inc. v. Baxter International Inc., No. 2012-1334 (Fed. Cir. July 2, 2013) where, but for a remand on damages and the injunction, Baxter would have had the right to collect on its $25 million judgment for infringement of US 5,247,434 (the '434 patent)....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!